OBJECTIVE: To use social network analysis to design more effective strategies for vaccinating healthcare workers against influenza. DESIGN: An agent-based simulation. SETTING: A simulation based on a 700-bed hospital. METHODS: We first observed human contacts (defined as approach within approximately 0.9 m) performed by 15 categories of healthcare workers (eg, floor nurses, intensive care unit nurses, staff physicians, phlebotomists, and respiratory therapists). We then constructed a series of contact graphs to represent the social network of the hospital and used these graphs to run agent-based simulations to model the spread of influenza. A targeted vaccination strategy that preferentially vaccinated more "connected" healthcare workers was compared with other vaccination strategies during simulations with various base vaccination rates, vaccine effectiveness, probability of transmission, duration of infection, and patient length of stay. RESULTS: We recorded 6,654 contacts by 148 workers during 606 hours of observations from January through December 2006. Unit clerks, X-ray technicians, residents and fellows, transporters, and physical and occupational therapists had the most contacts. When repeated contacts with the same individual were excluded, transporters, unit clerks, X-ray technicians, physical and occupational therapists, and social workers had the most contacts. Preferentially vaccinating healthcare workers in more connected job categories yielded a substantially lower attack rate and fewer infections than a random vaccination strategy for all simulation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Social network models can be used to derive more effective vaccination policies, which are crucial during vaccine shortages or in facilities with low vaccination rates. Local vaccination priorities can be determined in any healthcare facility with only a modest investment in collection of observational data on different types of healthcare workers. Our findings and methods (ie, social network analysis and computational simulation) have implications for the design of effective interventions to control a broad range of healthcare-associated infections.
OBJECTIVE: To use social network analysis to design more effective strategies for vaccinating healthcare workers against influenza. DESIGN: An agent-based simulation. SETTING: A simulation based on a 700-bed hospital. METHODS: We first observed human contacts (defined as approach within approximately 0.9 m) performed by 15 categories of healthcare workers (eg, floor nurses, intensive care unit nurses, staff physicians, phlebotomists, and respiratory therapists). We then constructed a series of contact graphs to represent the social network of the hospital and used these graphs to run agent-based simulations to model the spread of influenza. A targeted vaccination strategy that preferentially vaccinated more "connected" healthcare workers was compared with other vaccination strategies during simulations with various base vaccination rates, vaccine effectiveness, probability of transmission, duration of infection, and patient length of stay. RESULTS: We recorded 6,654 contacts by 148 workers during 606 hours of observations from January through December 2006. Unit clerks, X-ray technicians, residents and fellows, transporters, and physical and occupational therapists had the most contacts. When repeated contacts with the same individual were excluded, transporters, unit clerks, X-ray technicians, physical and occupational therapists, and social workers had the most contacts. Preferentially vaccinating healthcare workers in more connected job categories yielded a substantially lower attack rate and fewer infections than a random vaccination strategy for all simulation parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Social network models can be used to derive more effective vaccination policies, which are crucial during vaccine shortages or in facilities with low vaccination rates. Local vaccination priorities can be determined in any healthcare facility with only a modest investment in collection of observational data on different types of healthcare workers. Our findings and methods (ie, social network analysis and computational simulation) have implications for the design of effective interventions to control a broad range of healthcare-associated infections.
Authors: Georgia P Dash; Loretta Fauerbach; Jeanne Pfeiffer; Barbara Soule; Judene Bartley; Bonnie M Barnard; Tammy Lundstrom; Mary Andrus Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: R M Christley; G L Pinchbeck; R G Bowers; D Clancy; N P French; R Bennett; J Turner Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-09-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Fabrice Carrat; Elisabeta Vergu; Neil M Ferguson; Magali Lemaitre; Simon Cauchemez; Steve Leach; Alain-Jacques Valleron Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-01-29 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jacob E Simmering; Linnea A Polgreen; David R Campbell; Joseph E Cavanaugh; Philip M Polgreen Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Thomas Hornbeck; David Naylor; Alberto M Segre; Geb Thomas; Ted Herman; Philip M Polgreen Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-10-08 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Lauren N Carroll; Alan P Au; Landon Todd Detwiler; Tsung-Chieh Fu; Ian S Painter; Neil F Abernethy Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2014-04-16 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Marco Cusumano-Towner; Daniel Y Li; Shanshan Tuo; Gomathi Krishnan; David M Maslove Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Juliette Stehlé; Nicolas Voirin; Alain Barrat; Ciro Cattuto; Vittoria Colizza; Lorenzo Isella; Corinne Régis; Jean-François Pinton; Nagham Khanafer; Wouter Van den Broeck; Philippe Vanhems Journal: BMC Med Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 8.775