Literature DB >> 20649369

The essential tension between leadership and power: when leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest.

Jon K Maner1, Nicole L Mead.   

Abstract

Throughout human history, leaders have been responsible for helping groups attain important goals. Ideally, leaders use their power to steer groups toward desired outcomes. However, leaders can also use their power in the service of self-interest rather than effective leadership. Five experiments identified factors within both the person and the social context that determine whether leaders wield their power to promote group goals versus self-interest. In most cases, leaders behaved in a manner consistent with group goals. However, when their power was tenuous due to instability within the hierarchy, leaders high (but not low) in dominance motivation prioritized their own power over group goals: They withheld valuable information from the group, excluded a highly skilled group member, and prevented a proficient group member from having any influence over a group task. These self-interested actions were eliminated when the group was competing against a rival outgroup. Findings provide important insight into factors that influence the way leaders navigate the essential tension between leadership and power. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20649369     DOI: 10.1037/a0018559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  10 in total

1.  When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power.

Authors:  Nickola C Overall; Matthew D Hammond; James K McNulty; Eli J Finkel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-08

2.  Both loved and feared: third party punishers are viewed as formidable and likeable, but these reputational benefits may only be open to dominant individuals.

Authors:  David S Gordon; Joah R Madden; Stephen E G Lea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  When those who know do share: Group goals facilitate information sharing, but social power does not undermine it.

Authors:  Annika Scholl; Florian Landkammer; Kai Sassenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of dominance and prestige based social status on competition for attentional resources.

Authors:  Ashton Roberts; Romina Palermo; Troy A W Visser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A framework for managing health research capacity strengthening consortia: addressing tensions and enhancing capacity outcomes.

Authors:  Nadia Tagoe; Justin Pulford; Sam Kinyanjui; Sassy Molyneux
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-10

6.  The inter-group comparison-intra-group cooperation hypothesis: comparisons between groups increase efficiency in public goods provision.

Authors:  Robert Böhm; Bettina Rockenbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Who cries wolf, and when? Manipulation of perceived threats to preserve rank in cooperative groups.

Authors:  Pat Barclay; Stephen Benard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Power Corrupts, but Control Does Not: What Stands Behind the Effects of Holding High Positions.

Authors:  Aleksandra Cislak; Aleksandra Cichocka; Adrian Dominik Wojcik; Natalia Frankowska
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-02-27

9.  In-Organization Ethics Power-Allocation Mechanisms and Members' Decision-Making Behavior.

Authors:  Yudan Pang; Xuefeng Wang; Hang Wu; Fanfan Zhang
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28

10.  The Relationship Between Employee's Status Perception and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Psychological Path of Work Vitality.

Authors:  Yuhao Liu; Xiangzhou Yin; Si Li; Xingchi Zhou; Ruilin Zhu; Fei Zhang
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2021-06-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.