Literature DB >> 20647477

Immunologic response to xenogeneic gp100 DNA in melanoma patients: comparison of particle-mediated epidermal delivery with intramuscular injection.

Brian A Ginsberg1, Humilidad F Gallardo, Teresa S Rasalan, Matthew Adamow, Zhenyu Mu, Sapna Tandon, Barrett B Bewkes, Ruth-Ann Roman, Paul B Chapman, Gary K Schwartz, Richard D Carvajal, Katherine S Panageas, Stephanie L Terzulli, Alan N Houghton, Jianda D Yuan, Jedd D Wolchok.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prior studies show that i.m. injection of xenogeneic orthologues of melanosomal antigens (tyrosinase, gp100) induces CD8(+) T-cell responses to the syngeneic protein. To further define the optimal vaccination strategy, we conducted a pilot clinical trial comparing i.m. injection with particle-mediated epidermal delivery (PMED). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*0201(+) disease-free melanoma patients were randomized to the PMED or i.m. arm, receiving eight vaccinations over 4 months. Patients received 4 microg or 2,000 microg per injection, respectively, of mouse gp100 DNA. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected, cultured with gp100 peptides, and analyzed by tetramer and intracellular cytokine staining for responses to HLA-A*0201-restricted gp100 epitopes [gp100(209-217) (ITDQVPFSV) and gp100(280-288) (YLEPGPVTA)].
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with stage IIB-IV melanoma were analyzable for immune response. The only common toxicity was grade 1 injection site reaction in nine patients with no intergroup difference, and one dose-limiting toxicity of acute hypersensitivity occurred in a PMED patient with undiagnosed gold allergy. Four of 27 patients produced gp100 tetramer(+)CD8(+) T cells, all carrying the CCR7(lo)CD45RA(lo) effector-memory phenotype. Five of 27 patients generated IFN-gamma(+)CD8(+) T cells, one who was also tetramer-positive. Overall, vaccination induced a response in 30% of patients, which was not significantly associated with study arm or clinical outcome. However, the PMED group showed a trend toward increased IFN-gamma(+)CD8(+) T-cell generation (P = 0.07).
CONCLUSION: A comparable efficacy and safety profile was shown between the i.m. and PMED arms, despite a significantly decreased dose of DNA used for PMED injection. (c) 2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20647477      PMCID: PMC4241567          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  32 in total

1.  Genetic immunization is a simple method for eliciting an immune response.

Authors:  D C Tang; M DeVit; S A Johnston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Systemic therapy for cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan Treisman; Nina Garlie
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.017

3.  In vivo promoter activity and transgene expression in mammalian somatic tissues evaluated by using particle bombardment.

Authors:  L Cheng; P R Ziegelhoffer; N S Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Xenogeneic DNA immunization in melanoma models for minimal residual disease.

Authors:  William G Hawkins; Jason S Gold; Nathalie E Blachere; Wilbur B Bowne; Axel Hoos; Jonathan J Lewis; Alan N Houghton
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Tumor immunity and autoimmunity induced by immunization with homologous DNA.

Authors:  L W Weber; W B Bowne; J D Wolchok; R Srinivasan; J Qin; Y Moroi; R Clynes; P Song; J J Lewis; A N Houghton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Injection of DNA encoding granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor recruits dendritic cells for immune adjuvant effects.

Authors:  W B Bowne; J D Wolchok; W G Hawkins; R Srinivasan; P Gregor; N E Blachere; Y Moroi; M E Engelhorn; A N Houghton; J J Lewis
Journal:  Cytokines Cell Mol Ther       Date:  1999-12

7.  Immunization with DNA coding for gp100 results in CD4 T-cell independent antitumor immunity.

Authors:  W G Hawkins; J S Gold; R Dyall; J D Wolchok; A Hoos; W B Bowne; R Srinivasan; A N Houghton; J J Lewis
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria.

Authors:  Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Comparison of the CD8+ T cell responses and antitumor effects generated by DNA vaccine administered through gene gun, biojector, and syringe.

Authors:  Cornelia Trimble; Cheng-Tao Lin; Chien-Fu Hung; Sara Pai; Jeremy Juang; Liangmei He; Maura Gillison; Drew Pardoll; Lee Wu; T-C Wu
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation.

Authors:  M F Krummel; J P Allison
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  16 in total

1.  Novel and enhanced anti-melanoma DNA vaccine targeting the tyrosinase protein inhibits myeloid-derived suppressor cells and tumor growth in a syngeneic prophylactic and therapeutic murine model.

Authors:  J Yan; C Tingey; R Lyde; T C Gorham; D K Choo; A Muthumani; D Myles; L P Weiner; K A Kraynyak; E L Reuschel; T H Finkel; J J Kim; N Y Sardesai; K E Ugen; K Muthumani; D B Weiner
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.987

2.  Elevated tumor-associated antigen expression suppresses variant peptide vaccine responses.

Authors:  Charles B Kemmler; Eric T Clambey; Ross M Kedl; Jill E Slansky
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 3.  Preclinical and clinical development of DNA vaccines for prostate cancer.

Authors:  V T Colluru; Laura E Johnson; Brian M Olson; Douglas G McNeel
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy.

Authors:  Derek Ng Tang; Yu Shen; Jingjing Sun; Sijin Wen; Jedd D Wolchok; Jianda Yuan; James P Allison; Padmanee Sharma
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 11.151

5.  Physiological and genomic consequences of adrenergic deficiency during embryonic/fetal development in mice: impact on retinoic acid metabolism.

Authors:  Kingsley Osuala; Candice N Baker; Ha-Long Nguyen; Celines Martinez; David Weinshenker; Steven N Ebert
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 6.  Harnessing DNA-induced immune responses for improving cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Andrés A Herrada; Nicole Rojas-Colonelli; Paula González-Figueroa; Jonathan Roco; César Oyarce; Maarten A Ligtenberg; Alvaro Lladser
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Evaluation of biolistic gene transfer methods in vivo using non-invasive bioluminescent imaging techniques.

Authors:  Jixiang Xia; Angela Martinez; Henry Daniell; Steven N Ebert
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 2.563

Review 8.  DNA vaccination: using the patient's immune system to overcome cancer.

Authors:  Georg Eschenburg; Alexander Stermann; Robert Preissner; Hellmuth-Alexander Meyer; Holger N Lode
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2010-12-16

Review 9.  DNA vaccine for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Benjamin Yang; Jessica Jeang; Andrew Yang; T C Wu; Chien-Fu Hung
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Combination of novel intravesical xenogeneic urothelial cell immunotherapy and chemotherapy enhances anti-tumor efficacy in preclinical murine bladder tumor models.

Authors:  Chi-Ping Huang; Chun-Chie Wu; Chih-Rong Shyr
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.968

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.