Literature DB >> 23111166

Harnessing DNA-induced immune responses for improving cancer vaccines.

Andrés A Herrada1, Nicole Rojas-Colonelli, Paula González-Figueroa, Jonathan Roco, César Oyarce, Maarten A Ligtenberg, Alvaro Lladser.   

Abstract

DNA vaccines have emerged as an attractive strategy to promote protective cellular and humoral immunity against the encoded antigen. DNA vaccines are easy to generate, inexpensive to produce and purify at large-scale, highly stable and safe. In addition, plasmids used for DNA vaccines act as powerful "danger signals" by stimulating several DNA-sensing innate immune receptors that promote the induction of protective adaptive immunity. The induction of tumor-specific immune responses represents a major challenge for DNA vaccines because most of tumor-associated antigens are normal non-mutated self-antigens. As a consequence, induction of potentially self-reactive T cell responses against such poorly immunogenic antigens is controlled by mechanisms of central and peripheral tolerance as well as tumor-induced immunosuppression. Although several DNA vaccines against cancer have reached clinical testing, disappointing results have been observed. Therefore, the development of new adjuvants that strongly stimulate the induction of antitumor T cell immunity and counteract immune-suppressive regulation is an attractive approach to enhance the potency of DNA vaccines and overcome tumor-associated tolerance. Understanding the DNA-sensing signaling pathways of innate immunity that mediate the induction of T cell responses elicited by DNA vaccines represents a unique opportunity to develop novel adjuvants that enhance vaccine potency. The advance of DNA adjuvants needs to be complemented with the development of potent delivery systems, in order to step toward successful clinical application. Here, we briefly discuss recent evidence showing how to harness DNA-induced immune response to improve the potency of cancer vaccines and counteract tumor-associated tolerance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA electroporation; DNA vaccine; adaptive immunity; cancer vaccines; innate immunity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23111166      PMCID: PMC3601143          DOI: 10.4161/hv.22345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  149 in total

Review 1.  Dendritic cells: specialized and regulated antigen processing machines.

Authors:  I Mellman; R M Steinman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  The cytosolic nucleic acid sensor LRRFIP1 mediates the production of type I interferon via a beta-catenin-dependent pathway.

Authors:  Pengyuan Yang; Huazhang An; Xingguang Liu; Mingyue Wen; Yuanyuan Zheng; Yaocheng Rui; Xuetao Cao
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 25.606

3.  Regulation of DNA-raised immune responses by cotransfected interferon regulatory factors.

Authors:  Shin Sasaki; Rama Rao Amara; Wen-Shuz Yeow; Paula M Pitha; Harriet L Robinson
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Molecular adjuvant HMGB1 enhances anti-influenza immunity during DNA vaccination.

Authors:  P Fagone; D J Shedlock; H Bao; O U Kawalekar; J Yan; D Gupta; M P Morrow; A Patel; G P Kobinger; K Muthumani; D B Weiner
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Optimization of codon usage of plasmid DNA vaccine is required for the effective MHC class I-restricted T cell responses against an intracellular bacterium.

Authors:  M Uchijima; A Yoshida; T Nagata; Y Koide
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Modulation of tryptophan catabolism by regulatory T cells.

Authors:  Francesca Fallarino; Ursula Grohmann; Kwang Woo Hwang; Ciriana Orabona; Carmine Vacca; Roberta Bianchi; Maria Laura Belladonna; Maria Cristina Fioretti; Maria-Luisa Alegre; Paolo Puccetti
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2003-10-26       Impact factor: 25.606

7.  Increased circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells correlate with clinical cancer stage, metastatic tumor burden, and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.

Authors:  C Marcela Diaz-Montero; Mohamed Labib Salem; Michael I Nishimura; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; David J Cole; Alberto J Montero
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 6.968

8.  FK506 as an adjuvant of tolerogenic DNA vaccination for the prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Youmin Kang; Jia Zhao; Yue Liu; Aoshuang Chen; Guoxing Zheng; Yang Yu; Jianjie Mi; Qiang Zou; Bin Wang
Journal:  J Gene Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.565

9.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Jose R Conejo-Garcia; Dionyssios Katsaros; Phyllis A Gimotty; Marco Massobrio; Giorgia Regnani; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Heidi Gray; Katia Schlienger; Michael N Liebman; Stephen C Rubin; George Coukos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Immunogenicity of varicella zoster virus glycoprotein E DNA vaccine.

Authors:  Lidao Bao; Guomin Wei; Hongmei Gan; Xianhua Ren; Ruilian Ma; Y I Wang; Haijun Lv
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Comparison of DNA and mRNA vaccines against cancer.

Authors:  Zohreh Jahanafrooz; Behzad Baradaran; Jafar Mosafer; Mahmoud Hashemzaei; Tayebeh Rezaei; Ahad Mokhtarzadeh; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Inhibition of the Innate Immune Receptors for Foreign DNA Sensing Improves Transfection Efficiency of Gene Electrotransfer in Melanoma B16F10 Cells.

Authors:  Masa Bosnjak; Urska Kamensek; Gregor Sersa; Danijela Stolfa; Jaka Lavrencak; Maja Cemazar
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  The SAT Protein of Porcine Parvovirus Accelerates Viral Spreading through Induction of Irreversible Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.

Authors:  István Mészáros; Renáta Tóth; Ferenc Olasz; Peter Tijssen; Zoltán Zádori
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Codon-Optimized P1A-Encoding DNA Vaccine: Toward a Therapeutic Vaccination against P815 Mastocytoma.

Authors:  Alessandra Lopes; Kevin Vanvarenberg; Véronique Préat; Gaëlle Vandermeulen
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 8.886

Review 6.  CSPG4: a prototype oncoantigen for translational immunotherapy studies.

Authors:  Valeria Rolih; Giuseppina Barutello; Selina Iussich; Raffaella De Maria; Elena Quaglino; Paolo Buracco; Federica Cavallo; Federica Riccardo
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 7.  Making a Cold Tumor Hot: The Role of Vaccines in the Treatment of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Stephen C Frederico; John C Hancock; Emily E S Brettschneider; Nivedita M Ratnam; Mark R Gilbert; Masaki Terabe
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Combination of immune checkpoint blockade with DNA cancer vaccine induces potent antitumor immunity against P815 mastocytoma.

Authors:  Alessandra Lopes; Kevin Vanvarenberg; Špela Kos; Sophie Lucas; Didier Colau; Benoît Van den Eynde; Véronique Préat; Gaëlle Vandermeulen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.