BACKGROUND: Performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) by using standard endoscopy platforms is technically challenging because of the equipment's lack of dexterity. OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of using the Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER), a novel robotics-enhanced endosurgical system, to perform ESD. DESIGN: ESD was performed on simulated gastric lesions in 5 Erlangen porcine stomach models (ex vivo) and 5 live pigs (in vivo). Performance of ESD by using the MASTER was compared with that using the insulation-tipped (IT) diathermic knife. SETTING: SMART Laboratory, Advance Surgical Training Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore. SUBJECTS: Five Erlangen porcine stomach models and 5 pigs, 5 to 7 months old, each weighing about 35 kg. INTERVENTIONS: ESD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Lesion resection time, grasper and hook efficacy grade, completeness of resection, and presence of procedure-related perforation. RESULTS: In the Erlangen stomach models, 15 simulated lesions from the cardia, antrum, and body were removed en bloc (mean dimension, 37.4 x 26.5 mm) by electrocautery excision using the MASTER. The mean ESD time was 23.9 minutes (range 7-48 minutes). There was no difference in the dissection times of lesions at different locations (P = .449). In the live pigs, the MASTER took a mean of 16.2 minutes (range 3-29 minutes) to complete the ESD of 5 gastric lesions, whereas the IT diathermic knife took 18.6 minutes (range 9-34 minutes). There was no significant difference in the times taken (P = .708). All lesions were excised en bloc; the mean dimensions of lesions resected by the MASTER and the IT diathermic knife were 37.2 x 30.1 mm and 32.78 x 25.6 mm, respectively. The MASTER exhibited good grasping and cutting efficiency throughout. Surgical maneuvers were achieved with ease and precision. There was no incidence of excessive bleeding or stomach wall perforation. LIMITATIONS: Exploratory study with limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Performing ESD by using the MASTER is feasible. Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Performing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) by using standard endoscopy platforms is technically challenging because of the equipment's lack of dexterity. OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of using the Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER), a novel robotics-enhanced endosurgical system, to perform ESD. DESIGN: ESD was performed on simulated gastric lesions in 5 Erlangen porcine stomach models (ex vivo) and 5 live pigs (in vivo). Performance of ESD by using the MASTER was compared with that using the insulation-tipped (IT) diathermic knife. SETTING: SMART Laboratory, Advance Surgical Training Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore. SUBJECTS: Five Erlangen porcine stomach models and 5 pigs, 5 to 7 months old, each weighing about 35 kg. INTERVENTIONS: ESD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Lesion resection time, grasper and hook efficacy grade, completeness of resection, and presence of procedure-related perforation. RESULTS: In the Erlangen stomach models, 15 simulated lesions from the cardia, antrum, and body were removed en bloc (mean dimension, 37.4 x 26.5 mm) by electrocautery excision using the MASTER. The mean ESD time was 23.9 minutes (range 7-48 minutes). There was no difference in the dissection times of lesions at different locations (P = .449). In the live pigs, the MASTER took a mean of 16.2 minutes (range 3-29 minutes) to complete the ESD of 5 gastric lesions, whereas the IT diathermic knife took 18.6 minutes (range 9-34 minutes). There was no significant difference in the times taken (P = .708). All lesions were excised en bloc; the mean dimensions of lesions resected by the MASTER and the IT diathermic knife were 37.2 x 30.1 mm and 32.78 x 25.6 mm, respectively. The MASTER exhibited good grasping and cutting efficiency throughout. Surgical maneuvers were achieved with ease and precision. There was no incidence of excessive bleeding or stomach wall perforation. LIMITATIONS: Exploratory study with limited sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Performing ESD by using the MASTER is feasible. Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Philip W Y Chiu; S J Phee; Z Wang; Z Sun; Carmen C Poon; T Yamamoto; I Penny; Jennie Y Y Wong; James Y W Lau; K Y Ho Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Miguel A Tanimoto; M Lourdes Guerrero; Yoshinori Morita; Jonathan Aguirre-Valadez; Elisa Gomez; Carlos Moctezuma-Velazquez; Jose A Estradas-Trujillo; Miguel A Valdovinos; Luis F Uscanga; Rikiya Fujita Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2015-04-16