BACKGROUND: It has previously been shown that there is a good agreement between the Selvester QRS score and myocardial infarct (MI) size determined by postmortem histopathology in patients with nonreperfused MI. Currently, however, most patients with acute coronary thrombosis receive reperfusion therapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that early reperfusion alters the quantitative relationship between Selvester QRS score and MI size. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with acute first-time reperfused MI were studied. Infarct size was determined by delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) and estimated with the 50-criteria/31-point Selvester QRS scoring system 1 week after admission. The findings in the present study were compared with previous postmortem studies exploring the quantitative relationship between Selvester QRS score and MI size in nonreperfused patients. RESULTS: The quantitative relationship between QRS score and MI size by DE-MRI in the present study of early reperfused MI was significantly different from previous postmortem histopathology studies of nonreperfused MI (P < 0.0001). In the present study, each QRS point represented approximately 2% of the left ventricle, compared to approximately 3% in previous postmortem histopathology studies of nonreperfused MI. When only considering small to moderate MI sizes, there was no significant difference in the quantitative relationship between QRS score and infarct size (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a different quantitative relationship between QRS score and MI size in early reperfused MI compared to nonreperfused MI, partly explained by differences in MI size. Thus, the Selvester QRS scoring system may not be linearly related to MI size.
BACKGROUND: It has previously been shown that there is a good agreement between the Selvester QRS score and myocardial infarct (MI) size determined by postmortem histopathology in patients with nonreperfused MI. Currently, however, most patients with acute coronary thrombosis receive reperfusion therapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that early reperfusion alters the quantitative relationship between Selvester QRS score and MI size. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with acute first-time reperfused MI were studied. Infarct size was determined by delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) and estimated with the 50-criteria/31-point Selvester QRS scoring system 1 week after admission. The findings in the present study were compared with previous postmortem studies exploring the quantitative relationship between Selvester QRS score and MI size in nonreperfused patients. RESULTS: The quantitative relationship between QRS score and MI size by DE-MRI in the present study of early reperfused MI was significantly different from previous postmortem histopathology studies of nonreperfused MI (P < 0.0001). In the present study, each QRS point represented approximately 2% of the left ventricle, compared to approximately 3% in previous postmortem histopathology studies of nonreperfused MI. When only considering small to moderate MI sizes, there was no significant difference in the quantitative relationship between QRS score and infarct size (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There is a different quantitative relationship between QRS score and MI size in early reperfused MI compared to nonreperfused MI, partly explained by differences in MI size. Thus, the Selvester QRS scoring system may not be linearly related to MI size.
Authors: Henrik Engblom; Erik Hedström; Einar Heiberg; Galen S Wagner; Olle Pahlm; Håkan Arheden Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Andrew T Yan; Adolphe J Shayne; Kenneth A Brown; Sandeep N Gupta; Carmen W Chan; Tuan M Luu; Marcelo F Di Carli; H Glenn Reynolds; William G Stevenson; Raymond Y Kwong Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-06-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: H Arheden; M Saeed; C B Higgins; D W Gao; J Bremerich; R Wyttenbach; M W Dae; M F Wendland Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: André Schmidt; Clerio F Azevedo; Alan Cheng; Sandeep N Gupta; David A Bluemke; Thomas K Foo; Gary Gerstenblith; Robert G Weiss; Eduardo Marbán; Gordon F Tomaselli; João A C Lima; Katherine C Wu Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-03-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S F Roark; R E Ideker; G S Wagner; D R Alonso; S P Bishop; C M Bloor; D A Bramlet; J E Edwards; J T Fallon; G J Gottlieb; D B Hackel; H R Phillips; K A Reimer; W J Rogers; W K Ruth; R M Savage; R D White; R H Selvester Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1983-02 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Henrik Engblom; Galen S Wagner; Randy M Setser; Ronald H Selvester; Therese Billgren; Jane M Kasper; Charles Maynard; Olle Pahlm; Håkan Arheden; Richard D White Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: G S Wagner; C J Freye; S T Palmeri; S F Roark; N C Stack; R E Ideker; F E Harrell; R H Selvester Journal: Circulation Date: 1982-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Uzma Chaudhry; Pyotr G Platonov; Robert Jablonowski; Jean-Philippe Couderc; Henrik Engblom; Xiajuang Xia; Björn Wieslander; Brett D Atwater; David G Strauss; Jesper Van der Pals; Martin Ugander; Marcus Carlsson; Rasmus Borgquist Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 1.468