Literature DB >> 20645028

Distribution of some activating KRAS and BRAF mutations in Slovene patients with colorectal cancer.

Alenka Ličar1, Petra Cerkovnik, Srdjan Novaković.   

Abstract

Numerous clinical studies have shown that anti-EGFR therapies are effective only in a subset of patients with colorectal cancer. Even though mutations in the KRAS gene have been confirmed as negative predictors of the response to EGFR-targeted therapies, not all KRAS wild-type (wt-KRAS) patients will respond to treatment. Recent studies have demonstrated that additionally wild-type BRAF (wt-BRAF) genotype is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab, suggesting that BRAF genotype criteria should be used together with KRAS genotype for selecting the patients who are about to benefit from the anti-EGFR therapy. In this study, 239 samples obtained from 215 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were tested for the presence of the seven most common mutations in the KRAS gene and the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene. Among the tested patients, 53.8% of patients had wt-KRAS genotype and 46.2% were KRAS mutants. Around five percent (5.1%) of the tested patients bore the V600E mutation in BRAF gene. All the patients showing to have the V600E mutation in BRAF were wt-KRAS. The concordance of KRAS and BRAF mutational status between primary and metastatic tumor tissue samples was 100%. We have shown that the proportions of mutated and non-mutated KRAS in Slovene patients, as well as the proportion of V600E mutations in BRAF is similar to genotyping results reported by other authors. The tested seven KRAS mutations on codons 12 and 13 were mutually exclusive with the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene. Summing up the results about the KRAS and the BRAF mutation carriers from our study, the portion of potentially non-responsive patients for the anti-EGFR treatment is 51.3%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20645028     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-010-9631-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  36 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Helena Linardou; Issa J Dahabreh; Dimitra Kanaloupiti; Fotios Siannis; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Paris Kosmidis; Christos A Papadimitriou; Samuel Murray
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Mutational analysis of BRAF and K-ras in gastric cancers: absence of BRAF mutations in gastric cancers.

Authors:  Il-Jin Kim; Jae-Hyun Park; Hio Chung Kang; Yong Shin; Hye-Won Park; Hye-Rin Park; Ja-Lok Ku; Seok-Byung Lim; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial.

Authors:  Arnaud D Roth; Sabine Tejpar; Mauro Delorenzi; Pu Yan; Roberto Fiocca; Dirk Klingbiel; Daniel Dietrich; Bart Biesmans; György Bodoky; Carlo Barone; Enrique Aranda; Bernard Nordlinger; Laura Cisar; Roberto Labianca; David Cunningham; Eric Van Cutsem; Fred Bosman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  BRAF silencing by short hairpin RNA or chemical blockade by PLX4032 leads to different responses in melanoma and thyroid carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Elisa Sala; Luca Mologni; Silvia Truffa; Carlo Gaetano; Gideon E Bollag; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 5.852

5.  High concordance of KRAS status between primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Daniele Santini; Fotios Loupakis; Bruno Vincenzi; Irene Floriani; Irene Stasi; Emanuele Canestrari; Eliana Rulli; Paolo Enrico Maltese; Francesca Andreoni; Gianluca Masi; Francesco Graziano; Giacomo Giulio Baldi; Lisa Salvatore; Antonio Russo; Giuseppe Perrone; Maria Rosa Tommasino; Mauro Magnani; Alfredo Falcone; Giuseppe Tonini; Annamaria Ruzzo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-12-04

6.  Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of cetuximab against tumor cells with wild-type or mutant epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Hideharu Kimura; Kazuko Sakai; Tokuzo Arao; Tatsu Shimoyama; Tomohide Tamura; Kazuto Nishio
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2007-05-13       Impact factor: 6.716

7.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Molecular mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Bardelli; Salvatore Siena
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy.

Authors:  F Di Fiore; F Blanchard; F Charbonnier; F Le Pessot; A Lamy; M P Galais; L Bastit; A Killian; R Sesboüé; J J Tuech; A M Queuniet; B Paillot; J C Sabourin; F Michot; P Michel; T Frebourg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  Unexpected effect of the monoclonal antibody Panitumumab on human cancer cells with different KRAS status.

Authors:  Nina Tiemann; Guido Hildebrandt; Katrin Manda
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Different metastatic pattern according to the KRAS mutational status and site-specific discordance of KRAS status in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Ji Hyun Kwon; Jeong-Ok Lee; Soo-Mee Bang; Kyoung Un Park; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Jae-Sung Kim; Jong Seok Lee; Keun-Wook Lee
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in correlation with BRAF V600E and different KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer - a single institution retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Martina Rebersek; Marko Boc; Petra Cerkovnik; Jernej Benedik; Zvezdana Hlebanja; Neva Volk; Srdjan Novakovic; Janja Ocvirk
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Analysis of the anti-tumor effect of cetuximab using protein kinetics and mouse xenograft models.

Authors:  Teppei Matsuo; Satoshi S Nishizuka; Kazushige Ishida; Takeshi Iwaya; Miyuki Ikeda; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-05-10

5.  Role of specific DNA mutations in the peripheral blood of colorectal cancer patients for the assessment of tumor stage and residual disease following tumor resection.

Authors:  Gregor Norcic; Franc Jelenc; Petra Cerkovnik; Vida Stegel; Srdjan Novakovic
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  A case report of successful diagnosis of a pulmonary nodule by a survey of oncogenic mutations; primary lung carcinoma or pulmonary metastasis?

Authors:  Akira Haro; Erina Kuramitsu; Ichiro Yamamoto; Yasuro Fukuyama
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-11-03

Review 7.  Primary tumor resection in stage IV unresectable colorectal cancer: what has changed?

Authors:  Michał Pędziwiatr; Magdalena Mizera; Jan Witowski; Piotr Major; Grzegorz Torbicz; Natalia Gajewska; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Molecular biomarkers and histological parameters impact on survival and response to first- line systemic therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Martina Rebersek; Tanja Mesti; Marko Boc; Janja Ocvirk
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Detection of Somatic Mutations with ddPCR from Liquid Biopsy of Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Uršula Prosenc Zmrzljak; Rok Košir; Zoran Krivokapić; Dragica Radojković; Aleksandra Nikolić
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Transcriptomic heterogeneity of driver gene mutations reveals novel mutual exclusivity and improves exploration of functional associations.

Authors:  Yujia Lan; Wei Liu; Wanmei Zhang; Jing Hu; Xiaojing Zhu; Linyun Wan; Suru A; Yanyan Ping; Yun Xiao
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.