PURPOSE:Chronically ill older patients with multiple conditions are challenging to care for, and new models of care for this population are needed. This study evaluates the effect of the Guided Care model on primary care physicians' impressions of processes of care for chronically ill older patients. METHODS: In Guided Care a specially educated registered nurse works at the practice with 2 to 5 primary care physicians, performing 8 clinical activities for 50 to 60 chronically ill older patients. The care model was tested in a cluster-randomized controlled trial between 2006 and 2009. All eligible primary care physicians in 14 pods (teams of physicians and their chronically ill older patients) agreed to participate (n = 49). Pods were randomly assigned to provide either Guided Care or usual care. Physicians were surveyed at baseline and 1 year later. We assessed the effects of Guided Care using responses from 38 physicians who completed both survey questionnaires. We measured physicians' satisfaction with chronic care processes, time spent on chronic care, knowledge of their chronically ill older patients, and care coordination provided by physicians and office staff. RESULTS: Compared with the physicians in the control group, those in the Guided Care group rated their satisfaction with patient/family communication and their knowledge of the clinical characteristics of their chronically ill older patients significantly higher (rho<0.05 in linear regression models). Other differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Based on physician report, Guided Care provides important benefits to physicians by improving communication with chronically ill older patients and their families and in physicians' knowledge of their patients' clinical conditions.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Chronically ill older patients with multiple conditions are challenging to care for, and new models of care for this population are needed. This study evaluates the effect of the Guided Care model on primary care physicians' impressions of processes of care for chronically ill older patients. METHODS: In Guided Care a specially educated registered nurse works at the practice with 2 to 5 primary care physicians, performing 8 clinical activities for 50 to 60 chronically ill older patients. The care model was tested in a cluster-randomized controlled trial between 2006 and 2009. All eligible primary care physicians in 14 pods (teams of physicians and their chronically ill older patients) agreed to participate (n = 49). Pods were randomly assigned to provide either Guided Care or usual care. Physicians were surveyed at baseline and 1 year later. We assessed the effects of Guided Care using responses from 38 physicians who completed both survey questionnaires. We measured physicians' satisfaction with chronic care processes, time spent on chronic care, knowledge of their chronically ill older patients, and care coordination provided by physicians and office staff. RESULTS: Compared with the physicians in the control group, those in the Guided Care group rated their satisfaction with patient/family communication and their knowledge of the clinical characteristics of their chronically ill older patients significantly higher (rho<0.05 in linear regression models). Other differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Based on physician report, Guided Care provides important benefits to physicians by improving communication with chronically ill older patients and their families and in physicians' knowledge of their patients' clinical conditions.
Authors: Cynthia M Boyd; Lisa Reider; Katherine Frey; Daniel Scharfstein; Bruce Leff; Jennifer Wolff; Carol Groves; Lya Karm; Stephen Wegener; Jill Marsteller; Chad Boult Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-12-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Luis González-de Paz; Belchin Kostov; Jose A López-Pina; Adelaida Zabalegui-Yárnoz; M Dolores Navarro-Rubio; Antoni Sisó-Almirall Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-05-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Sarah E Lewis; Robert S Nocon; Hui Tang; Seo Young Park; Anusha M Vable; Lawrence P Casalino; Elbert S Huang; Michael T Quinn; Deborah L Burnet; Wm Thomas Summerfelt; Jonathan M Birnberg; Marshall H Chin Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-01-09
Authors: Chad Boult; Lisa Reider; Bruce Leff; Kevin D Frick; Cynthia M Boyd; Jennifer L Wolff; Katherine Frey; Lya Karm; Stephen T Wegener; Tracy Mroz; Daniel O Scharfstein Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-03-14
Authors: A Thomas McLellan; Joanna L Starrels; Betty Tai; Adam J Gordon; Richard Brown; Udi Ghitza; Marc Gourevitch; Jack Stein; Marla Oros; Terry Horton; Robert Lindblad; Jennifer McNeely Journal: Public Health Rev Date: 2014-01
Authors: Jill A Marsteller; Yea-Jen Hsu; Mei Wen; Jennifer Wolff; Kevin Frick; Lisa Reider; Daniel Scharfstein; Cynthia Boyd; Bruce Leff; Lindsay Schwartz; Lya Karm; Chad Boult Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Chad Boult; Bruce Leff; Cynthia M Boyd; Jennifer L Wolff; Jill A Marsteller; Kevin D Frick; Stephen Wegener; Lisa Reider; Katherine Frey; Tracy M Mroz; Lya Karm; Daniel O Scharfstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 5.128