Literature DB >> 10541159

Molecular diagnosis of bilateral coronal synostosis.

J B Mulliken1, D Steinberger, S Kunze, U Müller.   

Abstract

The authors performed a prospective study evaluating molecular diagnosis in patients with bilateral coronal synostosis. The patients were divided into two groups: (1) those clinically classified as having Apert, Crouzon, or Pfeiffer syndrome and (2) those clinically unclassified and labeled as having brachycephaly. Blood samples were drawn for genomic DNA analysis from 57 patients from 1995 to 1997. Polymerase chain reactions were performed using primers flanking exons in FGFR 1, 2, and 3. Each exon was screened for mutations using single-strand confirmation polymorphism, and mutations were identified by DNA sequencing. Mutations in FGFR2 or FGFR3 were found in all patients (n = 38) assigned a phenotypic (eponymous) diagnosis. All Apert syndrome patients (n = 13) carried one of the two known point mutations in exon 7 of FGFR2 (Ser252Trp and Pro253Arg). Twenty-five patients were diagnosed as having either Crouzon or Pfeiffer syndrome. Five patients with Crouzon syndrome of variable severity had mutations in exon 7 of FGFR2. Fifteen patients (12 with Crouzon, 3 with Pfeiffer) had a mutation in exon 9 of FGFR2, many of which involved loss or gain of a cysteine residue. A wide phenotypic range was observed in patients with identical mutations, including those involving cysteine. Two patients labeled as having Crouzon syndrome had the Pro250Arg mutation in exon 7 of FGFR3. All three patients with the crouzonoid phenotype and acanthosis nigricans had the same mutation in exon 10 of FGFR3 (Ala391Glu). This is a distinct disorder, characterized by jugular foraminal stenosis, Chiari I anomaly, and intracranial venous hypertension. Mutations were found in 14 of 19 clinically unclassifiable patients. Three mutations were in exon 9, and one was in the donor splice site of intron 9 on FGFR2. The most common mutation discovered in this group was Pro250Arg in exon 7 of FGFR3. These patients (n = 10) had either bilateral or unilateral coronal synostosis, minimal midfacial hypoplasia with class I or class II occlusion, and minor brachysyndactyly. No mutations in FGFR 1, 2, or 3 were detected in five patients with nonspecific brachycephaly. In conclusion, a molecular diagnosis was possible in all patients (n = 38) given a phenotypic (eponymous) diagnosis. Different phenotypes observed with identical mutations probably resulted from modulation by their genetic background. A molecular diagnosis was made in 74 percent of the 19 unclassified patients in this series; all mutations were in FGFR2 or FGFR3. Our data and those of other investigators suggest that we should begin integrating molecular diagnosis with phenotypic diagnosis of craniosynostoses in studies of natural history and dysmorphology and in analyses of surgical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10541159     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199911000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  24 in total

1.  Prominent basal emissary foramina in syndromic craniosynostosis: correlation with phenotypic and molecular diagnoses.

Authors:  C D Robson; J B Mulliken; R L Robertson; M R Proctor; D Steinberger; P D Barnes; A McFarren; U Müller; D Zurakowski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Prevalence and complications of single-gene and chromosomal disorders in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Andrew O M Wilkie; Jo C Byren; Jane A Hurst; Jayaratnam Jayamohan; David Johnson; Samantha J L Knight; Tracy Lester; Peter G Richards; Stephen R F Twigg; Steven A Wall
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 4.  Venous hypertension and craniosynostosis.

Authors:  R Hayward
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Hydrocephalus in craniosynostosis: a review.

Authors:  H Collmann; N Sörensen; J Krauss
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  Complex craniosynostoses: a review of the prominent clinical features and the related management strategies.

Authors:  G Tamburrini; M Caldarelli; L Massimi; G Gasparini; S Pelo; C Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Evaluation of Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy and Orthotic Therapy for Bilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Conor T Williams; David J Segar; Sybill D Naidoo; Gary B Skolnick; Mark R Proctor; Matthew D Smyth; Kamlesh B Patel
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  A Korean family with the Muenke syndrome.

Authors:  Jae Eun Yu; Dong Ha Park; Soo Han Yoon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Lambdoidal synostosis in dizygotic twins with a family history of an undiagnosed connective tissue disorder.

Authors:  Caroline C Watson; Christoph J Griessenauer; R Shane Tubbs; James M Johnston
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  [Typical features of craniofacial growth of the FGFR3-associated coronal synostosis syndrome (so-called Muenke craniosynostosis)].

Authors:  E Reinhart; S Eulert; J Bill; K Würzler; L Phan The; J Reuther
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.