BACKGROUND: Methamphetamine (METH) is a widely abused psychostimulant that is associated with neurotoxicity and neurocognitive impairments in adults. However, the effects of METH use on neurocognitive performance of adolescents are unclear. METHODS: Fifty-four adolescent METH users and 74 age-matched comparison subjects (ages 12 to 23 years) were evaluated with a battery of neuropsychological tests. The cognitive domains evaluated include psychomotor (Symbol Digit, Trail Making), executive function (Stroop Interference task, Wisconsin Card Sort task), fine-motor speed (Grooved Pegboard), memory (Digit span and Auditory Verbal Learning Task), as well as attention and working memory (California Computerized Assessment package). RESULTS: METH users were slower on the Stroop Interference task than the comparison subjects (F(1,114) = 4.33, p = 0.03). METH subjects also performed worse than controls on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III/Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children IV (WAIS/WISC) Matrices task (F(1,114) = 4.37, p = 0.04) and performed significantly worse on the Peg Board task than the comparison subjects for both the dominant (F(1,114) = 7.56, p = 0.01) and non-dominant (F(1,114) = 6.75, p = 0.01). Lastly, length of abstinence was associated with improved performance on the Peg Board test with the dominant had (r = -0.34), as well as the WAIS/WISC Forward Digit Span task (r = 0.38) CONCLUSIONS: METH use is associated with impaired executive functions in adolescent users.
BACKGROUND:Methamphetamine (METH) is a widely abused psychostimulant that is associated with neurotoxicity and neurocognitive impairments in adults. However, the effects of METH use on neurocognitive performance of adolescents are unclear. METHODS: Fifty-four adolescent METH users and 74 age-matched comparison subjects (ages 12 to 23 years) were evaluated with a battery of neuropsychological tests. The cognitive domains evaluated include psychomotor (Symbol Digit, Trail Making), executive function (Stroop Interference task, Wisconsin Card Sort task), fine-motor speed (Grooved Pegboard), memory (Digit span and Auditory Verbal Learning Task), as well as attention and working memory (California Computerized Assessment package). RESULTS:METH users were slower on the Stroop Interference task than the comparison subjects (F(1,114) = 4.33, p = 0.03). METH subjects also performed worse than controls on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III/Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children IV (WAIS/WISC) Matrices task (F(1,114) = 4.37, p = 0.04) and performed significantly worse on the Peg Board task than the comparison subjects for both the dominant (F(1,114) = 7.56, p = 0.01) and non-dominant (F(1,114) = 6.75, p = 0.01). Lastly, length of abstinence was associated with improved performance on the Peg Board test with the dominant had (r = -0.34), as well as the WAIS/WISC Forward Digit Span task (r = 0.38) CONCLUSIONS:METH use is associated with impaired executive functions in adolescent users.
Authors: N D Volkow; L Chang; G J Wang; J S Fowler; D Franceschi; M Sedler; S J Gatley; E Miller; R Hitzemann; Y S Ding; J Logan Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2001-12-01 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Linda Chang; Thomas Ernst; Oliver Speck; Hetal Patel; Menaka DeSilva; Maria Leonido-Yee; Eric N Miller Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: N D Volkow; L Chang; G J Wang; J S Fowler; Y S Ding; M Sedler; J Logan; D Franceschi; J Gatley; R Hitzemann; A Gifford; C Wong; N Pappas Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: N D Volkow; L Chang; G J Wang; J S Fowler; M Leonido-Yee; D Franceschi; M J Sedler; S J Gatley; R Hitzemann; Y S Ding; J Logan; C Wong; E N Miller Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Y Sekine; M Iyo; Y Ouchi; T Matsunaga; H Tsukada; H Okada; E Yoshikawa; M Futatsubashi; N Takei; N Mori Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Christine C Cloak; Daniel Alicata; Linda Chang; Brian Andrews-Shigaki; Thomas Ernst Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jennifer L Stewart; Colm G Connolly; April C May; Susan F Tapert; Marc Wittmann; Martin P Paulus Journal: Addiction Date: 2013-12-15 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Keith G Heinzerling; Janette Gadzhyan; Henry van Oudheusden; Felipe Rodriguez; James McCracken; Steven Shoptaw Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Young-Hoon Sung; Paul D Carey; Dan J Stein; Helen L Ferrett; Bruce S Spottiswoode; Perry F Renshaw; Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 3.332