Literature DB >> 20639024

Prospective evaluation of a single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence.

Michael J Kennelly1, Robert Moore, John N Nguyen, James C Lukban, Steven Siegel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We report 12-month outcomes of the MiniArc single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence in women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, prospective, single arm institutional review board/ethics committee approved study evaluating the effectiveness of the MiniArc sling after implantation via qualitative (Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short Form and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form) and quantitative (1-hour pad weight test and cough stress test) measurements. Secondary outcome measures included procedural variables (procedure time and estimated blood loss), length of stay, perioperative complications, Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale and adverse events.
RESULTS: A total of 188 women with a mean age of 51.1 +/- 10.6 years (median 50.4, range 25.9 to 79.6) were enrolled in the study. At 1 year 157 patients were available for analysis. Mean procedure time, estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay were 11.0 +/- 6.7 minutes (median 10, range 2 to 55), 41.7 +/- 47.0 ml (median 25, range 0 to 250) and 9.5 +/- 14.1 hours (median 3.2, range 0.5 to 77.2), respectively. At discharge from hospital the mean Wong-Baker pain score was 1.3 +/- 2.0 (range 0.0 to 10.0). Of the patients 90.6% had a negative cough stress test and 84.5% had a 1-hour pad weight test less than 1 gm at 12 months. Median Urogenital Distress Inventory-Short Form and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form scores showed a statistically significant decrease (p <0.001). Adverse events included urinary tract infection (4.3%), constipation (3.7%), temporary urinary retention (3.2%), dyspareunia (2.1%) and vaginal extrusion (1.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: The MiniArc single incision sling is a safe and effective first line surgical procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. It demonstrated excellent patient tolerability with minimal pain, early return to normal activity and low morbidity. In addition to sustained efficacy outcomes at 12 months patients treated with the MiniArc experienced a significant improvement in quality of life. Copyright (c) 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20639024     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Incontinence: Evaluation of a midurethral single incision sling.

Authors:  Ashley King; David E Rapp
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  A comparative study of a single-incision sling and a transobturator sling: clinical efficacy and urodynamic changes.

Authors:  Mou-Jong Sun; Ryan Sun; Yi-Ing Li
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Diagnosis and office-based treatment of urinary incontinence in adults. Part two: treatment.

Authors:  Anne P Cameron; Masahito Jimbo; Joel J Heidelbaugh
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-08

4.  TVT-Secur (Hammock) versus TVT-Obturator: a randomized trial of suburethral sling operative procedures.

Authors:  Lekha S Hota; Katherine Hanaway; Michele R Hacker; Anthony Disciullo; Eman Elkadry; Patricia Dramitinos; Alexander Shapiro; Tanaz Ferzandi; Peter L Rosenblatt
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

5.  Retropubic and transobturator slings: still useful or should all patients be treated with mini-slings?

Authors:  Michael J Kennelly; Erinn M Myers
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Miniarc single-incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Michael J Kennelly; Robert Moore; John N Nguyen; James Lukban; Steven Siegel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  A randomized, nonblinded extension study of single-incision versus transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  René P Schellart; Sandra E Zwolsman; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Dirk J M K de Ridder; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Surgical management of female SUI: is there a gold standard?

Authors:  Ashley Cox; Sender Herschorn; Livia Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Single-Incision Slings (SIS) - a New Option for the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  G Naumann; S Albrich; C Skala; R Laterza; H Kölbl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  René P Schellart; Katrien Oude Rengerink; Frank Van der Aa; Jean-Philippe Lucot; Bart Kimpe; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Jan-Paul W R Roovers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.