BACKGROUND: Only limited data are available on personal radio frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday life. Several European countries performed measurement studies in this area of research. However, a comparison between countries regarding typical exposure levels is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare for the first time mean exposure levels and contributions of different sources in specific environments between different European countries. METHODS: In five countries (Belgium, Switzerland, Slovenia, Hungary, and the Netherlands), measurement studies were performed using the same personal exposure meters. The pooled data were analyzed using the robust regression on order statistics (ROS) method in order to allow for data below the detection limit. Mean exposure levels were compared between different microenvironments such as homes, public transports, or outdoor. RESULTS: Exposure levels were of the same order of magnitude in all countries and well below the international exposure limits. In all countries except for the Netherlands, the highest total exposure was measured in transport vehicles (trains, car, and busses), mainly due to radiation from mobile phone handsets (up to 97%). Exposure levels were in general lower in private houses or flats than in offices and outdoors. At home, contributions from various sources were quite different between countries. CONCLUSIONS: Highest total personal RF-EMF exposure was measured inside transport vehicles and was well below international exposure limits. This is mainly due to mobile phone handsets. Mobile telecommunication can be considered to be the main contribution to total RF-EMF exposure in all microenvironments. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Only limited data are available on personal radio frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday life. Several European countries performed measurement studies in this area of research. However, a comparison between countries regarding typical exposure levels is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare for the first time mean exposure levels and contributions of different sources in specific environments between different European countries. METHODS: In five countries (Belgium, Switzerland, Slovenia, Hungary, and the Netherlands), measurement studies were performed using the same personal exposure meters. The pooled data were analyzed using the robust regression on order statistics (ROS) method in order to allow for data below the detection limit. Mean exposure levels were compared between different microenvironments such as homes, public transports, or outdoor. RESULTS: Exposure levels were of the same order of magnitude in all countries and well below the international exposure limits. In all countries except for the Netherlands, the highest total exposure was measured in transport vehicles (trains, car, and busses), mainly due to radiation from mobile phone handsets (up to 97%). Exposure levels were in general lower in private houses or flats than in offices and outdoors. At home, contributions from various sources were quite different between countries. CONCLUSIONS: Highest total personal RF-EMF exposure was measured inside transport vehicles and was well below international exposure limits. This is mainly due to mobile phone handsets. Mobile telecommunication can be considered to be the main contribution to total RF-EMF exposure in all microenvironments. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Peter Gajšek; Paolo Ravazzani; Joe Wiart; James Grellier; Theodoros Samaras; György Thuróczy Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Sam Aerts; David Plets; Arno Thielens; Luc Martens; Wout Joseph Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: D Plets; W Joseph; K Vanhecke; G Vermeeren; J Wiart; S Aerts; N Varsier; L Martens Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-02-22 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Gregor Dürrenberger; Jürg Fröhlich; Martin Röösli; Mats-Olof Mattsson Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 3.390