Literature DB >> 20638655

Shifting senses in lexical semantic development.

Hugh Rabagliati1, Gary F Marcus, Liina Pylkkänen.   

Abstract

Most words are associated with multiple senses. A DVD can be round (when describing a disc), and a DVD can be an hour long (when describing a movie), and in each case DVD means something different. The possible senses of a word are often predictable, and also constrained, as words cannot take just any meaning: for example, although a movie can be an hour long, it cannot sensibly be described as round (unlike a DVD). Learning the scope and limits of word meaning is vital for the comprehension of natural language, but poses a potentially difficult learnability problem for children. By testing what senses children are willing to assign to a variety of words, we demonstrate that, in comprehension, the problem is solved using a productive learning strategy. Children are perfectly capable of assigning different senses to a word; indeed they are essentially adult-like at assigning licensed meanings. But difficulties arise in determining which senses are assignable: children systematically overestimate the possible senses of a word, allowing meanings that adults rule unlicensed (e.g., taking round movie to refer to a disc). By contrast, this strategy does not extend to production, in which children use licensed, but not unlicensed, senses. Children's productive comprehension strategy suggests an early emerging facility for using context in sense resolution (a difficult task for natural language processing algorithms), but leaves an intriguing question as to the mechanisms children use to learn a restricted, adult-like set of senses. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20638655      PMCID: PMC2934859          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  27 in total

1.  Reading time evidence for enriched composition.

Authors:  B McElree; M J Traxler; M J Pickering; R E Seely; R Jackendoff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-01

2.  On knowing a word.

Authors:  G A Miller
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Rodolfo Llinás; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Developmental changes in the understanding of generics.

Authors:  Susan A Gelman; Paul Bloom
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-11-13

5.  The cost of question concealment: eye-tracking and MEG evidence.

Authors:  Jesse Harris; Liina Pylkkänen; Brian McElree; Steven Frisson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Preschool children's use of cues to generic meaning.

Authors:  Andrei Cimpian; Ellen M Markman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-08-31

7.  Judging a book by its cover and its contents: the representation of polysemous and homophonous meanings in four-year-old children.

Authors:  Mahesh Srinivasan; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Learning words and rules: abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Yael Gertner; Cynthia Fisher; Julie Eisengart
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-08

9.  Formal models of language learning.

Authors:  S Pinker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1979-09

10.  The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children's and adults' graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors.

Authors:  Ben Ambridge; Julian M Pine; Caroline F Rowland; Chris R Young
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.