Literature DB >> 20638186

Temporal lobe reactions after radiotherapy with carbon ions: incidence and estimation of the relative biological effectiveness by the local effect model.

Ingmar Schlampp1, Christian P Karger, Oliver Jäkel, Michael Scholz, Bernd Didinger, Anna Nikoghosyan, Angelika Hoess, Michael Krämer, Lutz Edler, Jürgen Debus, Daniela Schulz-Ertner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify predictors for the development of temporal lobe reactions (TLR) after carbon ion radiation therapy (RT) for radiation-resistant tumors in the central nervous system and to evaluate the predictions of the local effect model (LEM) used for calculation of the biologically effective dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study reports the TLR rates in patients with skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas irradiated with carbon ions at GSI, Darmstadt, Germany, in the years 2002 and 2003. Calculation of the relative biological effectiveness and dose optimization of treatment plans were performed on the basis of the LEM. Clinical examinations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after RT and annually thereafter. Local contrast medium enhancement in temporal lobes, as detected on MRI, was regarded as radiation-induced TLR. Dose-volume histograms of 118 temporal lobes in 59 patients were analyzed, and 16 therapy-associated and 2 patient-associated factors were statistically evaluated for their predictive value for the occurrence of TLR.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 2.5 years (range, 0.3-6.6 years). Age and maximum dose applied to at least 1 cm(3) of the temporal lobe (D(max,V - 1 cm)3, maximum dose in the remaining temporal lobe volume, excluding the volume 1 cm(3) with the highest dose) were found to be the most important predictors for TLR. Dose response curves of D(max,V - 1 cm)3 were calculated. The biologically equivalent tolerance doses for the 5% and 50% probabilities to develop TLR were 68.8 ± 3.3 Gy equivalents (GyE) and 87.3 ± 2.8 GyE, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: D(max,V - 1 cm)3 is predictive for radiation-induced TLR. The tolerance doses obtained seem to be consistent with published data for highly conformal photon and proton irradiations. We could not detect any clinically relevant deviations between clinical findings and expectations based on predictions of the LEM.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20638186     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

Review 1.  Re-irradiation with protons or heavy ions with focus on head and neck, skull base and brain malignancies.

Authors:  Katharina Seidensaal; Semi Ben Harrabi; Matthias Uhl; Juergen Debus
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Does Proton Therapy Have a Future in CNS Tumors?

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  The relative biological effectiveness of carbon ion radiation therapy for early stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Jeho Jeong; Vicki T Taasti; Andrew Jackson; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Active raster scanning with carbon ions: reirradiation in patients with recurrent skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas.

Authors:  Matthias Uhl; Thomas Welzel; Jan Oelmann; Gregor Habl; Henrik Hauswald; Alexandra Jensen; Malte Ellerbrock; Jürgen Debus; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Dosimetric comparison of protons vs photons in re-irradiation of intracranial meningioma.

Authors:  Robert Poel; Anja Stuessi Lobmaier; Nicolaus Andratschke; Jan Unkelbach; Stephanie Tanadini-Lang; Matthias Guckenberger; Robert Foerster
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Sinonasal malignancies and charged particle radiation treatment: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marco Cianchetti; Maurizio Amichetti
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-27

7.  Treatment of pediatric patients and young adults with particle therapy at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT): establishment of workflow and initial clinical data.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs; Kerstin A Kessel; Klaus Herfarth; Alexandra Jensen; Susanne Oertel; Claudia Blattmann; Swantje Ecker; Angelika Hoess; Eike Martin; Olaf Witt; Oliver Jäkel; Andreas E Kulozik; Jürgen Debus
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Radiation-induced temporal lobe injury after intensity modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a dose-volume-outcome analysis.

Authors:  Ying Sun; Guan-Qun Zhou; Zhen-Yu Qi; Li Zhang; Shao-Min Huang; Li-Zhi Liu; Li Li; Ai-Hua Lin; Jun Ma
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  LASSO-based NTCP model for radiation-induced temporal lobe injury developing after intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Cheng Kong; Xiang-Zhi Zhu; Tsair-Fwu Lee; Ping-Bo Feng; Jian-Hua Xu; Pu-Dong Qian; Lan-Fang Zhang; Xia He; Sheng-Fu Huang; Yi-Qin Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Carbon Ion Dose Constraints in the Head and Neck and Skull Base: Review of MedAustron Institutional Protocols.

Authors:  Piero Fossati; Ana Perpar; Markus Stock; Petra Georg; Antonio Carlino; Joanna Gora; Giovanna Martino; Eugen B Hug
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.