Literature DB >> 20637916

Clinical experience with the second-generation 3f Enable sutureless aortic valve prosthesis.

Thierry Aymard1, Alexander Kadner, Nazan Walpoth, Volkhart Göber, Lars Englberger, Mario Stalder, Friedrich Eckstein, Claudia Zobrist, Thierry Carrel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis (ATS Medical, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) represents a new generation of equine pericardial self-expanding valve designed for sutureless implantation. This study evaluated technical aspects of implantation and safety and effectiveness of the valve in the short term.
METHODS: In an outcome analysis of a consecutive series of 28 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with the 3f Enable during an 18-month period, mean age was 75.7 +/- 6.6 years, 18 patients were female (64.2%), and mean EuroSCORE was 7.1% +/- 1.7%.
RESULTS: Most implanted valves were 23 mm in diameter (19-27 mm). Mean aortic crossclamp time was 39 +/- 15 minutes (29-103 minutes), mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 58 +/- 20 minutes (41-127 minutes), mean hospital stay was 11 days (7-22 days), and 30-day mortality was 3.5%. Mean and peak intraoperative transvalvular pressure gradients were 6.1 +/- 2.6 and 18 +/- 5 mm Hg, respectively. Trivial and mild paravalvular leaks were observed in 1 patient each. One patient underwent reoperative aortic valve replacement 4 months after initial surgery for severe valve-unrelated paravalvular leakage. Five patients (18.5%) required permanent pacemakers. No patients were unavailable for follow-up. One-year survival was 86.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-f Enable aortic bioprosthesis can be implanted safely with favorable early hemodynamics. The self-expanding stent allows sutureless implantation with a large valve area. The procedure was fast, although not as fast as expected. This experience has led to continued design and procedural enhancements to facilitate and accelerate future implantation. Copyright 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20637916     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  5 in total

1.  Regression of left ventricular mass after implantation of the sutureless 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Giovanni Concistrè; Antonio Miceli; Federica Marchi; Francesca Chiaramonti; Mattia Glauber; Marco Solinas
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 2.  What are the current results of sutureless valves in high-risk aortic valve disease patients?

Authors:  Amir H Sepehripour; Leanne Harling; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-17

3.  Sutureless aortic bioprosthesis in severe aortic root calcification: an innovative approach.

Authors:  Giovanni Concistrè; Pierandrea Farneti; Antonio Miceli; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-20

Review 4.  Current status and future perspectives of prosthetic valve selection for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-05-31

5.  Mid-term follow-up after suture-less aortic heart valve implantation.

Authors:  Grzegorz Filip; Radoslaw Litwinowicz; Boguslaw Kapelak; Jacek Piatek; Magdalena Bartus; Janusz Konstanty-Kalandyk; Maciej Brzezinski; Krzysztof Bartus
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.