Literature DB >> 20637539

Performance of the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) gene and prostate-specific antigen in prescreened men: exploring the value of PCA3 for a first-line diagnostic test.

Monique J Roobol1, Fritz H Schröder, Pim van Leeuwen, Tineke Wolters, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Geert J L H van Leenders, Daphne Hessels.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The performance characteristics of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a diagnostic test for prostate cancer (PCa) are poor. The performance of the PCa antigen 3 (PCA3) gene as a primary diagnostic is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: Assess the value of PCA3 as a first-line diagnostic test. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants included men aged 63-75 who were invited for rescreening in the period from September 2007 to February 2009 within the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Rotterdam section.
INTERVENTIONS: Lateral sextant biopsies were performed if the serum PSA value was > or =3.0 ng/ml and/or the PCA3 score was > or =10. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements included distribution and correlation of PSA value and PCA3 score and their relation to the number of cases and the characteristics of PCa detected. Additional value of PCA3 was included in men with previous negative biopsy and/or PSA <3.0 ng/ml. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In 721 men, all biopsied, 122 PCa cases (16.9%) were detected. Correlation between PSA and PCA3 is poor (Spearman rank correlation: ρ=0.14; p<0.0001). A PSA > or =3.0 ng/ml misses 64.7% of the total PCa that can be detected with the sextant biopsy technique and 57.9% of serious PCa (T2a or higher and/or Gleason grade > or =4, n=19), and 68.2% of biopsies could have been avoided; the respective data for PCA3 > or =35 are 32%, 26.3%, and 51.7%. Performance of PCA3 in men with low PSA (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.63) and/or previous negative biopsy (AUC: 0.68) is unclear but has limited reliability due to small numbers.
CONCLUSIONS: PCA3 as a first-line screening test shows improvement of the performance characteristics and identification of serious disease compared with PSA in this prescreened population. Copyright 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20637539     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  50 in total

1.  Low serum testosterone levels are predictive of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Luigi Mearini; Alessandro Zucchi; Elisabetta Nunzi; Tommaso Villirillo; Vittorio Bini; Massimo Porena
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Addressing the need for repeat prostate biopsy: new technology and approaches.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; E Jason Abel; Tracy M Downs; Frederick Kelcz; David F Jarrard
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prostate cancer screening: Canadian guidelines 2011.

Authors:  Jonathan I Izawa; Laurence Klotz; D Robert Siemens; Wassim Kassouf; Alan So; John Jordan; Michael Chetner; Alla E Iansavichene
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  PCA3 Urinary Biomarker for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

5.  Prostate cancer: diagnostic performance of the PCA3 urine test.

Authors:  George Leighton Lee; Albert Dobi; Shiv Srivastava
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Recent Advances in Metabolic Profiling And Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Roopa Thapar; Mark A Titus
Journal:  Curr Metabolomics       Date:  2014-04

7.  The importance of plasma arginine level and its downstream metabolites in diagnosing prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ismail Selvi; Halil Basar; Numan Baydilli; Koza Murat; Ozlem Kaymaz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  An emerging understanding of long noncoding RNAs in kidney cancer.

Authors:  Shuigen Zhou; Jiandong Wang; Zhengyu Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Risk stratification in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Sigrid V Carlsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Assessment of long-term outcomes associated with urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion at repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Selin Merdan; Scott A Tomlins; Christine L Barnett; Todd M Morgan; James E Montie; John T Wei; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.