Literature DB >> 20637455

Magic at the marketplace: Choice blindness for the taste of jam and the smell of tea.

Lars Hall1, Petter Johansson, Betty Tärning, Sverker Sikström, Thérèse Deutgen.   

Abstract

We set up a tasting venue at a local supermarket and invited passerby shoppers to sample two different varieties of jam and tea, and to decide which alternative in each pair they preferred the most. Immediately after the participants had made their choice, we asked them to again sample the chosen alternative, and to verbally explain why they chose the way they did. At this point we secretly switched the contents of the sample containers, so that the outcome of the choice became the opposite of what the participants intended. In total, no more than a third of the manipulated trials were detected. Even for remarkably different tastes like Cinnamon-Apple and bitter Grapefruit, or the smell of Mango and Pernod was no more than half of all trials detected, thus demonstrating considerable levels of choice blindness for the taste and smell of two different consumer goods. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20637455     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  25 in total

Review 1.  Hypnotic suggestion: opportunities for cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  David A Oakley; Peter W Halligan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Influencing choices with conversational primes: How a magic trick unconsciously influences card choices.

Authors:  Alice Pailhès; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coherency Maximizing Exploration in the Supermarket.

Authors:  Peter S Riefer; Rosie Prior; Nicholas Blair; Giles Pavey; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-01-09

4.  Misremembering pain: A memory blindness approach to adding a better end.

Authors:  Emily J Urban; Kevin J Cochran; Amanda M Acevedo; Marie P Cross; Sarah D Pressman; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-07

5.  Memory blindness: Altered memory reports lead to distortion in eyewitness memory.

Authors:  Kevin J Cochran; Rachel L Greenspan; Daniel F Bogart; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

6.  Subtly encouraging more deliberate decisions: using a forcing technique and population stereotype to investigate free will.

Authors:  Alice Pailhès; Gustav Kuhn
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-14

Review 7.  The neural basis of metacognitive ability.

Authors:  Stephen M Fleming; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Haptic choice blindness.

Authors:  Catherine Steenfeldt-Kristensen; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-05-28

9.  Lifting the veil of morality: choice blindness and attitude reversals on a self-transforming survey.

Authors:  Lars Hall; Petter Johansson; Thomas Strandberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Choosing in freedom or forced to choose? Introspective blindness to psychological forcing in stage-magic.

Authors:  Diego E Shalom; Maximiliano G de Sousa Serro; Maximiliano Giaconia; Luis M Martinez; Andres Rieznik; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.