Literature DB >> 20637085

Fog-basking behaviour and water collection efficiency in Namib Desert Darkling beetles.

Thomas Nørgaard1, Marie Dacke1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Namib Desert fog represents an alternative water source. This is utilised by Darkling beetles (Tenebrionidae) that employ different strategies for obtaining the fog water. Some dig trenches in the sand, while others use their own bodies as fog collectors assuming a characteristic fog-basking stance. Two beetle species from the genus Onymacris have been observed to fog-bask on the ridges of the sand dunes. These beetles all have smooth elytra surfaces, while another species with elytra covered in bumps is reported to have specialised adaptations facilitating water capture by fog-basking. To resolve if these other beetles also fog-bask, and if an elytra covered in bumps is a more efficient fog water collector than a smooth one, we examined four Namib Desert beetles; the smooth Onymacris unguicularis and O. laeviceps and the bumpy Stenocara gracilipes and Physasterna cribripes. Here we describe the beetles' fog-basking behaviour, the details of their elytra structures, and determine how efficient their dorsal surface areas are at harvesting water from fog.
RESULTS: The beetles differ greatly in size. The largest P. cribripes has a dorsal surface area that is 1.39, 1.56, and 2.52 times larger than O. unguicularis, O. laeviceps, and S. gracilipes, respectively. In accordance with earlier reports, we found that the second largest O. unguicularis is the only one of the four beetles that assumes the head standing fog-basking behaviour, and that fog is necessary to trigger this behaviour. No differences were seen in the absolute amounts of fog water collected on the dorsal surface areas of the different beetles. However, data corrected according to the sizes of the beetles revealed differences. The better fog water harvesters were S. gracilipes and O. unguicularis while the large P. cribripes was the poorest. Examination of the elytra microstructures showed clear structural differences, but the elytra of all beetles were found to be completely hydrophobic.
CONCLUSIONS: The differences in fog water harvesting efficiency by the dorsal surface areas of beetles with very different elytra surface structures were minor. We therefore conclude that the fog-basking behaviour itself is a more important factor than structural adaptations when O. unguicularis collect water from fog.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20637085      PMCID: PMC2918599          DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Zool        ISSN: 1742-9994            Impact factor:   3.172


  3 in total

1.  The narrow-leaf syndrome: a functional and evolutionary approach to the form of fog-harvesting rosette plants.

Authors:  Carlos Martorell; Exequiel Ezcurra
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Water capture by a desert beetle.

Authors:  A R Parker; C R Lawrence
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Fog catchment sand trenches constructed by tenebrionid beetles, lepidochora, from the namib desert.

Authors:  M K Seely; W J Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total
  20 in total

1.  Dew condensation on desert beetle skin.

Authors:  J Guadarrama-Cetina; A Mongruel; M-G Medici; E Baquero; A R Parker; I Milimouk-Melnytchuk; W González-Viñas; D Beysens
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 1.890

2.  Evidence for root adaptation to a spatially discontinuous water availability in the absence of external water potential gradients.

Authors:  Kara R Lind; Oskar Siemianowski; Bin Yuan; Tom Sizmur; Hannah VanEvery; Souvik Banerjee; Ludovico Cademartiri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Namib Desert Soil Microbial Community Diversity, Assembly, and Function Along a Natural Xeric Gradient.

Authors:  Vincent Scola; Jean-Baptiste Ramond; Aline Frossard; Olivier Zablocki; Evelien M Adriaenssens; Riegardt M Johnson; Mary Seely; Don A Cowan
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Condensation on slippery asymmetric bumps.

Authors:  Kyoo-Chul Park; Philseok Kim; Alison Grinthal; Neil He; David Fox; James C Weaver; Joanna Aizenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Surface morphology enhances deposition efficiency in biomimetic, wind-driven fog collection.

Authors:  A Shahrokhian; J Feng; H King
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Fossoriality in desert-adapted tenebrionid (Coleoptera) larvae.

Authors:  Marcin Raś; Marcin Jan Kamiński; Dariusz Iwan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Bio-Inspired Robots and Structures toward Fostering the Modernization of Agriculture.

Authors:  Maria Kondoyanni; Dimitrios Loukatos; Chrysanthos Maraveas; Christos Drosos; Konstantinos G Arvanitis
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-29

Review 8.  A review on factors influencing fog formation, classification, forecasting, detection and impacts.

Authors:  Kanchan Lakra; Kirti Avishek
Journal:  Rend Lincei Sci Fis Nat       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 1.810

9.  Animal or plant: which is the better fog water collector?

Authors:  Thomas Nørgaard; Martin Ebner; Marie Dacke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A multi-structural and multi-functional integrated fog collection system in cactus.

Authors:  Jie Ju; Hao Bai; Yongmei Zheng; Tianyi Zhao; Ruochen Fang; Lei Jiang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.