Literature DB >> 20635452

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for correction of adolescent idiopatic scoliosis: comparison of 4.5 mm versus 5.5 mm rod constructs.

Hak Sun Kim1, Jin Oh Park, Ankur Nanda, Phillip Anthony Kho, Jin Young Kim, Hwan Mo Lee, Seong Hwan Moon, Jung Won Ha, Eun Kyoung Ahn, Dong Eun Shin, Sung Jun Kim, Eun Su Moon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to report the comparative results of thoracoscopic correction achieved via cantilever technique using a 4.5 mm thin rod and the poly-axial reduction screw technique using a 5.5 mm thick rod in Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographic data, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) patient-based outcome questionnaires, and operative records were reviewed for forty-nine patients undergoing surgical treatment of scoliosis. The study group was divided into a 4.5 mm thin rod group (n = 24) and a 5.5 mm thick rod group (n = 25). The radiographic parameters that were analyzed included coronal curve correction, the most caudal instrumented vertebra tilt angle correction, coronal balance, and thoracic kyphosis.
RESULTS: The major curve was corrected from 49.8 degrees and 47.2 degrees pre-operatively to 24.5 degrees and 18.8 degrees at the final follow-up for the thin and thick rod groups, respectively (50.8% vs. 60.2% correction). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of kyphosis, coronal balance, or tilt angle at the time of the final follow-up. The mean number of levels fused was 6.2 in the thin rod group, compared with 5.9 levels in the thick rod group. There were no major intraoperative complications in either group.
CONCLUSION: Significant correction loss was observed in the thin rod system at the final follow-up though both groups had comparable correction immediately post-operative. Therefore, the thick rod with poly axial screw system helps to maintain post-operative correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20635452      PMCID: PMC2908885          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.5.753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  23 in total

1.  Titanium versus stainless steel for anterior spinal fusions: an analysis of rod stress as a predictor of rod breakage during physiologic loading in a bovine model.

Authors:  Michelle Wedemeyer; Stefan Parent; Andrew Mahar; Tim Odell; Troy Swimmer; Peter Newton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Jochen P Son-Hing; Laurel C Blakemore; Connie Poe-Kochert; George H Thompson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Prospective evaluation of 50 consecutive scoliosis patients surgically treated with thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation.

Authors:  Peter O Newton; Stefan Parent; Michelle Marks; Jeff Pawelek
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Anterior dual rod instrumentation in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ulf R Liljenqvist; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte; Lars Hackenberg; Henry F Halm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; K H Bridwell; J Harms; D H Clements; T G Lowe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Surgical technique.

Authors:  Baron S Lonner; Dimitry Kondrachov; Farhan Siddiqi; Victor Hayes; Carrie Scharf
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R R Betz; J Harms; D H Clements; L G Lenke; T G Lowe; H L Shufflebarger; D Jeszenszky; B Beele
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Thoracoscopic spinal fusion compared with posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Baron S Lonner; Dimitry Kondrachov; Farhan Siddiqi; Victor Hayes; Carrie Scharf
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Construction and validation of a specific quality of life instrument for adolescents with spine deformities.

Authors:  J M Climent; A Reig; J Sánchez; C Roda
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Sagittal plane analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) anterior instrumentations.

Authors:  Hak-Sun Kim; Chong-Suh Lee; Byoung-Ho Jeon; Jin-Oh Park
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Simultaneous thoracoscopically assisted anterior release in prone position and posterior scoliosis correction : What are the limits?].

Authors:  H Böhm; H El Ghait; M Shousha
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery plus lumbar mini-open surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Hyon Su Chong; Hak Sun Kim; Nanda Ankur; Phillip Anthony Kho; Sung Jun Kim; Do Yeon Kim; Jin Oh Park; Seong Hwan Moon; Hwan Mo Lee; Eun Su Moon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.759

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.