Literature DB >> 20635106

Tooth-borne distraction of the lower anterior subapical segment for correction of class II malocclusion, subsequent to genioplasty.

Kazuhiro Matsushita1, Nobuo Inoue, Hiro-o Yamaguchi, Kazuhiro Ooi, Yasunori Totsuka.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Alveolar distraction is mainly used to increase height and width of the alveolar crest. This technique, however, is not typically used for lengthening the perimeter of the dental arch or improving teeth axes. We applied alveolar distraction in a tooth-borne manner in the second stage of our original method and obtained favorable results. We therefore present an outline of this method. CASE REPORT: Genioplasty was first performed to create an infrastructure for sequential advancement of the subapical alveolar segment. After bone union, anterior subapical alveolar osteotomy was performed. The stump of the osteotomized dentate segment was moved forward without changing the incisal edge position, and a box-type bioabsorbable plate with four holes was fixed only onto the dentate segment using two screws. After a latency period, two distraction devices were placed bilaterally to the brackets and activated at 1.0 mm/day. After reaching the desired position, the distractor was immobilized, and then replaced by resin temporary teeth to retain the created space. After the consolidation period, orthodontic treatment was restarted and teeth moved into the newly created space. Bimaxillary surgery was performed after completing pre-surgical orthodontic treatment. Finally, both desirable occlusion and functional masticatory function were obtained.
CONCLUSION: This tooth-borne distraction system is one applicable method for patients with skeletal class II and crowding of lower anterior teeth, achieving good results particularly in combination with our original method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20635106     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-010-0242-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  4 in total

1.  Anterior mandibular apical base augmentation in the surgical orthodontic treatment of mandibular retrusion.

Authors:  R Brusati; A B Giannì
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 2.  Alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review.

Authors:  N Saulacic; T Iizuka; M S Martin; A G Garcia
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Reactive changes in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular midline osteodistraction.

Authors:  R P Harper; W H Bell; R J Hinton; R Browne; A M Cherkashin; M L Samchukov
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Chin augmentation with thin cortical bone concomitant with advancement genioplasty.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Matsushita; Nobuo Inoue; Hiro-o Yamaguchi; Kazuhiro Ooi; Yasunori Totsuka
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.895

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Full-mouth rehabilitation of Class II deep-bite patient: A 5-year clinical report.

Authors:  Gulfem Ergun; Erdal Bozkaya
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

2.  Anterior Mandibular Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis: A Case Report.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Annette Dalgaard Kjellerup
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-09-28

3.  Evaluation of a three-stage method for improving mandibular retrognathia with labially inclined incisors using genioplasty, segmental osteotomy, and two-jaw surgery.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Matsushita; Hiro-O Yamaguchi; Mino Koshikawa-Matsuno; Nobuo Inoue
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2014-05-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.