Literature DB >> 17822881

Alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review.

N Saulacic1, T Iizuka, M S Martin, A G Garcia.   

Abstract

This literature review was performed to analyse the outcomes of clinical studies of alveolar distraction osteogenesis (DO) listed by PUBMED between January 1996 and December 2006. A PUBMED search identified 128 articles on alveolar DO. Twenty articles covering 209 cases were analysed, considering location, device and procedural parameters, rate of augmentation, aspect of final implant placement and follow up. The mean latency period was 7.26+/-2.31 days, distraction rate 0.71+/-0.27 mm/day, rate of augmentation 6.88+/-2.52 mm and consolidation period 12.22+/-5.58 weeks. A total of 469 implants were placed and followed post loading for an average of 14.19+/-11.03 months, with a survival rate of 97%. Of the different procedural parameters, only the difference between mean consolidation period for failed (8.10+/-2.51 weeks) and successful (12.43+/-5.62 weeks) implants was statistically significant (P=0.01). Use of DO may be advantageous in terms of the success rate of implants placed in augmented sites, but there is still a lack of sufficient data based on long-term follow up. Future experimental studies should evaluate the application of different methods with a view to shortening the overall treatment period and improving the performance of implants placed in distracted alveolar ridges.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17822881     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  8 in total

1.  Tooth-borne distraction of the lower anterior subapical segment for correction of class II malocclusion, subsequent to genioplasty.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Matsushita; Nobuo Inoue; Hiro-o Yamaguchi; Kazuhiro Ooi; Yasunori Totsuka
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-07-16

2.  Rehabilitation of edentulous atrophic anterior mandible - the role of vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Mathew O Mampilly; Latha P Rao; Joyce Sequiera; B H Sripathi Rao; Jagadish Chandra; Gunachandra Rai
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-11-20

3.  Aminobisphosphonate stimulates bone regeneration and enforces consolidation of titanium implant into a new rat caudal vertebrae model.

Authors:  József Blazsek; Csaba Dobó Nagy; István Blazsek; Rita Varga; Bálint Vecsei; Pál Fejérdy; Gábor Varga
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Vertical Alveolar Ridge Augmentation by Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Rajat Mohanty; N Nanda Kumar; C Ravindran
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

5.  Closure of large alveolar defect by maxillary alveolar distraction using a vector-controlled distractor appliance in cleft patients: A pilot study.

Authors:  Navneet Singh; Tulika Tripathi; Sujata Mohanty; Priyank Rai; Neha Bhutiani
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-02-19

6.  Dental implants placed on bone subjected to vertical alveolar distraction show the same performance as those placed on primitive bone.

Authors:  Mario Pérez-Sayáns; María De Los Ángeles León-Camacho; José-Manuel Somoza-Martín; Beatriz Fernández-González; Silvia Blanes-Vázquez-Gundín; José-Manuel Gándara-Rey; Abel García-García
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-07-01

7.  20 years of alveolar distraction: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  M Pérez-Sayáns; J-M Martínez-Martín; C Chamorro-Petronacci; M Gallas-Torreira; X Marichalar-Mendía; A García-García
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-11-01

8.  Creation of Bone and Soft Tissue in Postmaxillectomy Patients Using Curvilinear Transport Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Rushdi Hendricks; George Vicatos
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.