Literature DB >> 20634658

Evaluation of change in muscle activity as a result of posterior lumbar spine surgery using a dynamic modeling system.

Lacey Bresnahan1, Richard G Fessler, Raghu N Natarajan.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A commercially available musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine was modified to study the change in muscle activation as a result of posterior lumbar surgery at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 segments.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how graded resection of the lumbar paraspinal muscles as a result of posterior lumbar surgery affects muscle activity for a variety of movement tasks. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several in vivo studies compare the change in functional outcome of the paraspinal muscles following surgery. However, due to limitations that exist with current in vivo methods no study to date has been able to quantitatively examine how the function of individual muscles in the lumbar spine change in response to different levels of injury.
METHODS: A multibody dynamic musculoskeletal model of the lumbar spine was modified to measure muscle activity using a parametric examination of change in the cross-sectional area of muscles affected by posterior lumbar surgery.
RESULTS: This study shows that the reduction in muscle cross-sectional area as a result of posterior lumbar surgery at L3-L4 and L4-L5 results in a change in trunk muscle activity where the greatest change occurs during axial rotation and lateral bending. The results suggest that preservation of the posterior paraspinal musculature results in greater preservation of the normal muscle activity than traditional open techniques.
CONCLUSION: Preservation of the paraspinal musculature associated with minimally invasive surgical approaches to the lumbar better preserve postoperative muscle activity. This study suggests that there is a positive correlation between the reduction of paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area following posterior lumbar spine surgery and the alteration in trunk muscle activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20634658     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e45a6e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Cross-sectional area of human trunk paraspinal muscles before and after posterior lumbar surgery using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mohammad S Ghiasi; Navid Arjmand; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl; Farzam Farahmand; Hassan Hashemi; Sahar Bagheri; Mahsa Valizadeh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical Properties of Paraspinal Muscles Influence Spinal Loading-A Musculoskeletal Simulation Study.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; C Antonio Sanchez; Stephen H M Brown; John Street; Sidney Fels; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-02

4.  Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; John Street; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Ian Stavness; Marcel Dvorak; Sidney Fels; Thomas Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Simvastatin ameliorates cauda equina compression injury in a rat model of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Anandakumar Shunmugavel; Marcus M Martin; Mushfiquddin Khan; Anne G Copay; Brian R Subach; Thomas C Schuler; Inderjit Singh
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.

Authors:  Ulf S Nerland; Asgeir S Jakola; Ole Solheim; Clemens Weber; Vidar Rao; Greger Lønne; Tore K Solberg; Øyvind Salvesen; Sven M Carlsen; Øystein P Nygaard; Sasha Gulati
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-04-01

7.  Percutaneous spinal endoscopy with unilateral interlaminar approach to perform bilateral decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis: radiographic and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Jingbo Xue; Haoxiang Chen; Bin Zhu; Xuelin Li; Zhihua Ouyang; Shan Li; Zhun Xu; Yong Xie; Yiguo Yan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: a review of the current literature and clinical results.

Authors:  Albert P Wong; Zachary A Smith; Rohan R Lall; Lacey E Bresnahan; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-07-31

9.  Treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis secondary to ligamentum flavum hypertrophy using percutaneous endoscopy through interlaminar approach: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Yingjie Qi; Diarra Mohamed Diaty; Guanglei Zheng; Xiaoqiang Shen; Shangben Lin; Jiaqi Chen; Yongwei Song; Xiaomin Gu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.