BACKGROUND: Recurrence of prior invasive fungal infection (relapse rate of 30-50%) limits the success of stem cell transplantation. Secondary prophylaxis could reduce disease burden and improve survival. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective, open-label, multicenter trial was conducted evaluating voriconazole (4 mg/kg/12 h intravenously or 200 mg/12 h orally) as secondary antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with previous proven or probable invasive fungal infection. Voriconazole was started 48 h or more after completion of conditioning chemotherapy and was planned to be continued for 100-150 days. Patients were followed for 12 months. The primary end-point of the study was the incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal infection. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled, 41 of whom had acute leukemia. Previous invasive fungal infections were proven or probable aspergillosis (n=31), proven candidiasis (n=5) and other proven or probable infections (n=6); prior infection could not be confirmed in three patients. The median duration of voriconazole prophylaxis was 94 days. Eleven patients (24%) died within 12 months of transplantation, but only one due to systemic fungal disease. Three invasive fungal infections occurred post-transplant: two relapses (one candidemia and one fatal scedosporiosis) and one new zygomycosis in a patient with previous aspergillosis. The 1-year cumulative incidence of invasive fungal disease was 6.7±3.6%. Two patients were withdrawn from the study due to treatment-related adverse events (i.e. liver toxicity). CONCLUSIONS: Voriconazole appears to be safe and effective for secondary prophylaxis of systemic fungal infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The observed incidence of 6.7% (with one attributable death) is considerably lower than the relapse rate reported in historical controls, thus suggesting that voriconazole is a promising prophylactic agent in this population.
BACKGROUND: Recurrence of prior invasive fungal infection (relapse rate of 30-50%) limits the success of stem cell transplantation. Secondary prophylaxis could reduce disease burden and improve survival. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective, open-label, multicenter trial was conducted evaluating voriconazole (4 mg/kg/12 h intravenously or 200 mg/12 h orally) as secondary antifungal prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with previous proven or probable invasive fungal infection. Voriconazole was started 48 h or more after completion of conditioning chemotherapy and was planned to be continued for 100-150 days. Patients were followed for 12 months. The primary end-point of the study was the incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal infection. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled, 41 of whom had acute leukemia. Previous invasive fungal infections were proven or probable aspergillosis (n=31), proven candidiasis (n=5) and other proven or probable infections (n=6); prior infection could not be confirmed in three patients. The median duration of voriconazole prophylaxis was 94 days. Eleven patients (24%) died within 12 months of transplantation, but only one due to systemic fungal disease. Three invasive fungal infections occurred post-transplant: two relapses (one candidemia and one fatal scedosporiosis) and one new zygomycosis in a patient with previous aspergillosis. The 1-year cumulative incidence of invasive fungal disease was 6.7±3.6%. Two patients were withdrawn from the study due to treatment-related adverse events (i.e. liver toxicity). CONCLUSIONS:Voriconazole appears to be safe and effective for secondary prophylaxis of systemic fungal infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The observed incidence of 6.7% (with one attributable death) is considerably lower than the relapse rate reported in historical controls, thus suggesting that voriconazole is a promising prophylactic agent in this population.
Authors: Oliver A Cornely; Johan Maertens; Drew J Winston; John Perfect; Andrew J Ullmann; Thomas J Walsh; David Helfgott; Jerzy Holowiecki; Dick Stockelberg; Yeow-Tee Goh; Mario Petrini; Cathy Hardalo; Ramachandran Suresh; David Angulo-Gonzalez Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas J Walsh; Elias J Anaissie; David W Denning; Raoul Herbrecht; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Kieren A Marr; Vicki A Morrison; Brahm H Segal; William J Steinbach; David A Stevens; Jo-Anne van Burik; John R Wingard; Thomas F Patterson Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: K A Thursky; E G Playford; J F Seymour; T C Sorrell; D H Ellis; S D Guy; N Gilroy; J Chu; D R Shaw Journal: Intern Med J Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.048
Authors: Katherine Allinson; Hedwig Kolve; Hans G Gumbinger; H Josef Vormoor; Karoline Ehlert; Andreas H Groll Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Peter Troke; Koldo Aguirrebengoa; Carmen Arteaga; David Ellis; Christopher H Heath; Irja Lutsar; Montserrat Rovira; Quoc Nguyen; Monica Slavin; Sharon C A Chen Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Brian T Hill; Lavayna Kondapalli; Andrew Artz; Sonali Smith; Elizabeth Rich; Lucy Godley; Olatoyosi Odenike; Kenneth J Pursell; Richard A Larson; Wendy Stock; Koen van Besien Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2007-09
Authors: P de Fabritiis; A Spagnoli; P Di Bartolomeo; A Locasciulli; L Cudillo; G Milone; A Busca; A Picardi; R Scimè; A Bonini; L Cupelli; P Chiusolo; A Olivieri; S Santarone; M Poidomani; S Fallani; A Novelli; I Majolino Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2007-05-28 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Catherine Cordonnier; Montserrat Rovira; Johan Maertens; Oliver A Cornely; Per Ljungman; Hermann Einsele Journal: Haematologica Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 9.941