Literature DB >> 17251531

Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia.

Oliver A Cornely1, Johan Maertens, Drew J Winston, John Perfect, Andrew J Ullmann, Thomas J Walsh, David Helfgott, Jerzy Holowiecki, Dick Stockelberg, Yeow-Tee Goh, Mario Petrini, Cathy Hardalo, Ramachandran Suresh, David Angulo-Gonzalez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with neutropenia resulting from chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or the myelodysplastic syndrome are at high risk for difficult-to-treat and often fatal invasive fungal infections.
METHODS: In this randomized, multicenter study involving evaluators who were unaware of treatment assignments, we compared the efficacy and safety of posaconazole with those of fluconazole or itraconazole as prophylaxis for patients with prolonged neutropenia. Patients received prophylaxis with each cycle of chemotherapy until recovery from neutropenia and complete remission, until occurrence of an invasive fungal infection, or for up to 12 weeks, whichever came first. We compared the incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal infections during treatment (the primary end point) between the posaconazole and fluconazole or itraconazole groups; death from any cause and time to death were secondary end points.
RESULTS: A total of 304 patients were randomly assigned to receive posaconazole, and 298 patients were randomly assigned to receive fluconazole (240) or itraconazole (58). Proven or probable invasive fungal infections were reported in 7 patients (2%) in the posaconazole group and 25 patients (8%) in the fluconazole or itraconazole group (absolute reduction in the posaconazole group, -6%; 95% confidence interval, -9.7 to -2.5%; P<0.001), fulfilling statistical criteria for superiority. Significantly fewer patients in the posaconazole group had invasive aspergillosis (2 [1%] vs. 20 [7%], P<0.001). Survival was significantly longer among recipients of posaconazole than among recipients of fluconazole or itraconazole (P=0.04). Serious adverse events possibly or probably related to treatment were reported by 19 patients (6%) in the posaconazole group and 6 patients (2%) in the fluconazole or itraconazole group (P=0.01). The most common treatment-related adverse events in both groups were gastrointestinal tract disturbances.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or the myelodysplastic syndrome, posaconazole prevented invasive fungal infections more effectively than did either fluconazole or itraconazole and improved overall survival. There were more serious adverse events possibly or probably related to treatment in the posaconazole group. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00044486 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17251531     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa061094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  413 in total

1.  Ultra-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and sensitive bioassay methods for quantification of posaconazole plasma concentrations after oral dosing.

Authors:  Bertrand Rochat; Andres Pascual; Benoît Pesse; Frédéric Lamoth; Dominique Sanglard; Laurent A Decosterd; Jacques Bille; Oscar Marchetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Triazole antifungal agents in invasive fungal infections: a comparative review.

Authors:  Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Secondary Antifungal Prophylaxis in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)/Acute Leukemia Patients.

Authors:  Jean El Cheikh
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Concentration of antifungal agents within host cell membranes: a new paradigm governing the efficacy of prophylaxis.

Authors:  P Campoli; Q Al Abdallah; R Robitaille; N V Solis; J A Fielhaber; A S Kristof; M Laverdiere; S G Filler; D C Sheppard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Disseminated fusariosis occurring in two patients despite posaconazole prophylaxis.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Hiral D Parekh; Jennifer L Holter; Ronald A Greenfield
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Canadian clinical practice guidelines for invasive candidiasis in adults.

Authors:  Eric J Bow; Gerald Evans; Jeff Fuller; Michel Laverdière; Coleman Rotstein; Robert Rennie; Stephen D Shafran; Don Sheppard; Sylvie Carle; Peter Phillips; Donald C Vinh
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Fungal pathogens and primary antifungal prophylaxis in patients with hematological malignancies: one year experience.

Authors:  H Gedik; M T Yildirmak; F Simsek; D Aydin; N Demirel; O Yokus; D Arica
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.927

8.  Pharmacokinetics and absorption of posaconazole oral suspension under various gastric conditions in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Gopal Krishna; Allen Moton; Lei Ma; Matthew M Medlock; James McLeod
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Invasive coinfection with Aspergillus and Mucor in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Rui Bergantim; Elisabete Rios; Fernanda Trigo; Jose Eduardo Guimarães
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.859

10.  Isavuconazole Is as Effective as and Better Tolerated Than Voriconazole for Antifungal Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Palash Samanta; Cornelius J Clancy; Rachel V Marini; Ryan M Rivosecchi; Erin K McCreary; Ryan K Shields; Bonnie A Falcione; Alex Viehman; Lauren Sacha; Eun Jeong Kwak; Fernanda P Silveira; Pablo G Sanchez; Matthew Morrell; Lloyd Clarke; M Hong Nguyen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.