Literature DB >> 20633931

Predicting the onset of glaucoma: the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to theOcular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Robert N Weinreb1, Linda M Zangwill, Sonia Jain, Lida M Becerra, Keri Dirkes, Jody R Piltz-Seymour, George A Cioffi, Gary L Trick, Anne L Coleman, James D Brandt, Jefferey M Liebmann, Mae O Gordon, Michael A Kass.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive ability of baseline confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) Glaucoma Probability Score (GPS) for the development of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and to compare it with the Moorfields regression analysis (MRA) classification, other topographic optic disc parameters, and stereophotograph-based cup-to-disc ratio.
DESIGN: Longitudinal, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: We included 857 eyes of 438 participants in the CSLO Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) with good quality baseline CSLO images.
METHODS: The ability of baseline GPS, MRA, and optic disc parameters to predict the development of POAG was evaluated in univariate and multivariable proportional hazard ratio analyses. Likelihood ratios and positive and negative predictive values were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The POAG end point as determined by repeatable changes in the visual field or optic disc.
RESULTS: Sixty-four eyes of 50 CSLO Ancillary Study participants developed POAG. Median time to reach a POAG end point was 72.3 months. The 93 eyes of 388 participants not reaching endpoint were followed for a median of 124.9 months. Baseline GPS identified many more eyes as outside normal limits than the MRA. In multivariable analyses, all regional and global baseline GPS indices were significantly associated with the development of POAG; hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) ranged from 2.92 to 3.74 for an outside normal limits result. The MRA indices were also significantly associated with the development of POAG in multivariable analyses. In addition, the predictive ability of baseline GPS, MRA and stereometric parameters were similar to the predictive ability of models using photograph-based horizontal cup-to-disc ratio.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that baseline GPS, MRA, and stereoparameters alone or when combined with baseline clinical and demographic factors can be used to predict the development of POAG end points in OHTS participants and are as effective as stereophotographs for estimating the risk of developing POAG in ocular hypertensive subjects.
Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20633931      PMCID: PMC3938159          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  15 in total

1.  Baseline topographic optic disc measurements are associated with the development of primary open-angle glaucoma: the Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Authors:  Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Julia A Beiser; Charles C Berry; George A Cioffi; Anne L Coleman; Gary Trick; Jeffrey M Liebmann; James D Brandt; Jody R Piltz-Seymour; Keri A Dirkes; Suzanne Vega; Michael A Kass; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09

2.  Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score.

Authors:  Annemiek Coops; David Barry Henson; Anna J Kwartz; Paul Habib Artes
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies.

Authors:  D L Simel; G P Samsa; D B Matchar
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Detection of glaucoma using operator-dependent versus operator-independent classification in the Heidelberg retinal tomograph-III.

Authors:  N Harizman; J R Zelefsky; E Ilitchev; C Tello; R Ritch; J M Liebmann
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Users' guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  R Jaeschke; G H Guyatt; D L Sackett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images.

Authors:  N V Swindale; G Stjepanovic; A Chin; F S Mikelberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants.

Authors:  M O Gordon; M A Kass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-05

8.  Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  G Wollstein; D F Garway-Heath; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  The confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study: study design and baseline factors.

Authors:  Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Charles C Berry; Amanda R Smith; Keri A Dirkes; Jeffrey M Liebmann; James D Brandt; Gary Trick; George A Cioffi; Anne L Coleman; Jody R Piltz-Seymour; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Francesco Oddone; Marco Centofanti; Luca Rossetti; Michele Iester; Paolo Fogagnolo; Elisabetta Capris; Gianluca Manni
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  22 in total

1.  Glaucoma research community and FDA look to the future, II: NEI/FDA Glaucoma Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints Symposium: measures of structural change and visual function.

Authors:  Robert N Weinreb; Paul L Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  [Medicinal glaucoma therapy. What can we learn from large randomized clinical trials?].

Authors:  A G M Jünemann; C Huchzermeyer; R Rejdak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Longitudinal detection of optic nerve head changes by spectral domain optical coherence tomography in early experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  Lin He; Hongli Yang; Stuart K Gardiner; Galen Williams; Christy Hardin; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Brad Fortune; Claude F Burgoyne
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  [Arguments for prophylactic therapy of ocular hypertension].

Authors:  J Wahl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness.

Authors:  Federico Saenz-Frances; Claudia Sanz-Pozo; Lara Borrego-Sanz; Luis Jañez; Laura Morales-Fernandez; Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa; Julian Garcia-Sanchez; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Enrique Santos-Bueso
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Glaucoma Diagnosis: from the Artisanal to the Defined.

Authors:  Rachel L Anderson; Maria de Los Angeles Ramos Cadena; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2018-07-07

7.  The rate of structural change: the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy ancillary study to the ocular hypertension treatment study.

Authors:  Linda M Zangwill; Sonia Jain; Keri Dirkes; Feng He; Felipe A Medeiros; Gary L Trick; James D Brandt; George A Cioffi; Anne L Coleman; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Jody R Piltz-Seymour; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Evaluation of baseline structural factors for predicting glaucomatous visual-field progression using optical coherence tomography, scanning laser polarimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  M Sehi; N Bhardwaj; Y S Chung; D S Greenfield
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Agreement in identification of glaucomatous progression between the optic disc photography and Heidelberg retina tomography in young glaucomatous patients.

Authors:  Paraskeva Hentova-Sencanic; Ivan Sencanic; Goran Trajković; Marija Bozic; Nevena Bjelovic
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 10.  [Value of Heidelberg retinal tomography in glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  E M Hoffmann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.