Literature DB >> 20633615

An Integrated Assessment Scheme for assessing the adequacy of (eco)toxicological data under REACH.

Etje Hulzebos1, Sjofn Gunnarsdottir, Jean-Paul Rila, Zhichao Dang, Emiel Rorije.   

Abstract

REACH requires all available (eco)toxicological information, whether protocol studies, other experiments, or non-testing approaches such as read-across or (Q)SAR, to be collected and evaluated. However, guidance documents only limitedly address how adequacy of (eco)toxicological information can be assessed consistently and transparently. We propose an Integrated Assessment Scheme (IAS) for the evaluation of (eco)toxicological data. The IAS consists of three modules: (i) the reliability of the data; (ii) the validity of the methods the data are generated from and; (iii) the regulatory need of the data. Each module is assessed and documented using adjusted OECD principles for the validation of (Q)SARs. These adjusted principles provide a harmonised set of criteria for the evaluation of all types of (eco)toxicological data. Assessment codes, similar to Klimisch codes, are assigned to the evaluated information in each module. The coherent combination of the assessment codes of all three modules determines the overall adequacy of information for fulfilling the information requirement in REACH, and can serve as a weight in a Weight of Evidence procedure as mentioned in REACH Annex XI. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20633615     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  4 in total

1.  Towards the Development of Global Nano-Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Models: Zeta Potentials of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Andrey A Toropov; Natalia Sizochenko; Alla P Toropova; Jerzy Leszczynski
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  Eco-Benign Orange-Hued Pigment Derived from Aluminum-Enriched Biogenous Iron Oxide Sheaths.

Authors:  Katsunori Tamura; Yuri Oshima; Yuta Fuse; Noriyuki Nagaoka; Tatsuki Kunoh; Makoto Nakanishi; Tatsuo Fujii; Tokuro Nanba; Jun Takada
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-04-10

3.  Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria: Krauth et al. Respond.

Authors:  David Krauth; Tracey J Woodruff; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of animal studies: omission of well-established methods.

Authors:  Nancy B Beck; Richard A Becker; Alan Boobis; Dean Fergusson; John R Fowle; Julie Goodman; Sebastian Hoffmann; Manoj Lalu; Marcel Leist; Martin L Stephens
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.