Literature DB >> 20633605

Perturbation-evoked cortical activity reflects both the context and consequence of postural instability.

G Mochizuki1, S Boe, A Marlin, W E McIlRoy.   

Abstract

The cerebral cortex may play a role in the control of compensatory balance reactions by optimizing these responses to suit the task conditions and/or to stimulus (i.e. perturbation) characteristics. These possible contributions appear to be reflected by pre-perturbation and post-perturbation cortical activity. While studies have explored the characteristics and possible meaning of these different events (pre- vs. post-) there is little insight into the possible association between them. The purpose of this study was to explore whether pre- and post-perturbation cortical events are associated or whether they reflect different control processes linked to the control of balance. Twelve participants were presented temporally-predictable postural perturbations under four test conditions. The Block/Random tasks were designed to assess modifiability in CNS gain prior to instability, while the Unconstrained/Constrained tasks assessed responsiveness to the magnitude of instability. Perturbations were evoked by releasing a cable which held the participant in a forward lean position. The magnitude of pre-perturbation cortical activity scaled to perturbation amplitude when the magnitude of the perturbation was predictable [F(3,11)=2.906, P<0.05]. The amplitude of pre-perturbation cortical activity was large when the size of the forthcoming perturbation was unknown (13.8 + or - 7.9, 11.4 + or - 9.9, 16.9 + or - 9.3, and 16.1 + or - 10.6 muV for the Block Unconstrained and Constrained and Random Unconstrained and Constrained, respectively). In addition, N1 amplitude scaled to perturbation amplitude regardless of whether the size of the forthcoming perturbation was known (30.1 + or - 17.7, 11.4 + or - 7.1, 30.9 + or - 18.4, 12.4 + or - 6.1 muV). This is the first work to examine modifiability in the pre-perturbation cortical activity related to postural set alterations. The cerebral cortex differentially processes independent components prior to and following postural instability to generate compensatory responses linked to the conditions under which instability is experienced.
Copyright © 2010 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20633605     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  25 in total

1.  Dissociation of muscle and cortical response scaling to balance perturbation acceleration.

Authors:  Aiden M Payne; Greg Hajcak; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The impact of light fingertip touch on haptic cortical processing during a standing balance task.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; William E McIlroy; W Richard Staines; W Richard Staines
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cognition and balance control: does processing of explicit contextual cues of impending perturbations modulate automatic postural responses?

Authors:  Daniel Boari Coelho; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Postural and cortical responses following visual occlusion in standing and sitting tasks.

Authors:  Kwang Leng Goh; Susan Morris; Wee Lih Lee; Alexander Ring; Tele Tan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of magnitude and magnitude predictability of postural perturbations on preparatory cortical activity in older adults with and without Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Beth A Smith; Jesse V Jacobs; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor preparation for compensatory reach-to-grasp responses when viewing a wall-mounted safety handle.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; David M Cole; Blake Butler; Mahmoud Mansour; Garrett Rydalch; Douglas W McDannald; Sarah E Schwartz
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Do quiet standing centre of pressure measures within specific frequencies differ based on ability to recover balance in individuals with stroke?

Authors:  Alison Schinkel-Ivy; Jonathan C Singer; Elizabeth L Inness; Avril Mansfield
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Role of brain hemispheric dominance in anticipatory postural control strategies.

Authors:  David Cioncoloni; Deborah Rosignoli; Matteo Feurra; Simone Rossi; Marco Bonifazi; Alessandro Rossi; Riccardo Mazzocchio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Postural and Cortical Responses Following Visual Occlusion in Adults With and Without ASD.

Authors:  Kwang Leng Goh; Susan Morris; Richard Parsons; Alexander Ring; Tele Tan
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2018-05

10.  Effects of speed and direction of perturbation on electroencephalographic and balance responses.

Authors:  Rahul Goel; Recep A Ozdemir; Sho Nakagome; Jose L Contreras-Vidal; William H Paloski; Pranav J Parikh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.