Literature DB >> 20633405

Consensus paper: combining transcranial stimulation with neuroimaging.

Hartwig R Siebner1, Til O Bergmann, Sven Bestmann, Marcello Massimini, Heidi Johansen-Berg, Hitoshi Mochizuki, Daryl E Bohning, Erie D Boorman, Sergiu Groppa, Carlo Miniussi, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Reto Huber, Paul C J Taylor, Risto J Ilmoniemi, Luigi De Gennaro, Antonio P Strafella, Seppo Kähkönen, Stefan Klöppel, Giovanni B Frisoni, Mark S George, Mark Hallett, Stephan A Brandt, Matthew F Rushworth, Ulf Ziemann, John C Rothwell, Nick Ward, Leonardo G Cohen, Jürgen Baudewig, Tomás Paus, Yoshikazu Ugawa, Paolo M Rossini.   

Abstract

In the last decade, combined transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-neuroimaging studies have greatly stimulated research in the field of TMS and neuroimaging. Here, we review how TMS can be combined with various neuroimaging techniques to investigate human brain function. When applied during neuroimaging (online approach), TMS can be used to test how focal cortex stimulation acutely modifies the activity and connectivity in the stimulated neuronal circuits. TMS and neuroimaging can also be separated in time (offline approach). A conditioning session of repetitive TMS (rTMS) may be used to induce rapid reorganization in functional brain networks. The temporospatial patterns of TMS-induced reorganization can be subsequently mapped by using neuroimaging methods. Alternatively, neuroimaging may be performed first to localize brain areas that are involved in a given task. The temporospatial information obtained by neuroimaging can be used to define the optimal site and time point of stimulation in a subsequent experiment in which TMS is used to probe the functional contribution of the stimulated area to a specific task. In this review, we first address some general methodologic issues that need to be taken into account when using TMS in the context of neuroimaging. We then discuss the use of specific brain mapping techniques in conjunction with TMS. We emphasize that the various neuroimaging techniques offer complementary information and have different methodologic strengths and weaknesses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20633405     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  95 in total

1.  Differential impact of continuous theta-burst stimulation over left and right DLPFC on planning.

Authors:  Christoph P Kaller; Katharina Heinze; Annekathrein Frenkel; Claus H Läppchen; Josef M Unterrainer; Cornelius Weiller; Rüdiger Lange; Benjamin Rahm
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Time-varying coupling of EEG oscillations predicts excitability fluctuations in the primary motor cortex as reflected by motor evoked potentials amplitude: an EEG-TMS study.

Authors:  Florinda Ferreri; Fabrizio Vecchio; David Ponzo; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Combining transcranial direct current stimulation and neuroimaging: novel insights in understanding neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Anusha Venkatakrishnan; Marco Sandrini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  On-line effects of quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (QPS) on the contralateral hemisphere studied with somatosensory evoked potentials and near infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Masaki Hirose; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Stefan Jun Groiss; Yumiko Tanji; Koichiro Nakamura; Setsu Nakatani-Enomoto; Hiroyuki Enomoto; Masatoyo Nishizawa; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Convergence of human brain mapping tools: neuronavigated TMS parameters and fMRI activity in the hand motor area.

Authors:  Anna-Sophia Sarfeld; Svenja Diekhoff; Ling E Wang; Gianpiero Liuzzi; Kamil Uludağ; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Repetitive magnetic stimulation induces functional and structural plasticity of excitatory postsynapses in mouse organotypic hippocampal slice cultures.

Authors:  Andreas Vlachos; Florian Müller-Dahlhaus; Johannes Rosskopp; Maximilian Lenz; Ulf Ziemann; Thomas Deller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Interventional psychiatry: how should psychiatric educators incorporate neuromodulation into training?

Authors:  Nolan R Williams; Joseph J Taylor; Jonathan M Snipes; E Baron Short; Edward M Kantor; Mark S George
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2014-02-20

8.  Static field influences on transcranial magnetic stimulation: considerations for TMS in the scanner environment.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Reza Jalinous; Gabriela L Cantarero; John E Desmond
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 10.  New approaches to the study of human brain networks underlying spatial attention and related processes.

Authors:  Jon Driver; Felix Blankenburg; Sven Bestmann; Christian C Ruff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.