Literature DB >> 20633391

Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation/transcranial direct current stimulation in cognitive neurorehabilitation.

Carlo Miniussi1, Stefano F Cappa, Leonardo G Cohen, Agnes Floel, Felipe Fregni, Michael A Nitsche, Massimiliano Oliveri, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Walter Paulus, Alberto Priori, Vincent Walsh.   

Abstract

Cognitive deficits are a common consequence of neurologic disease, in particular, of traumatic brain injury, stroke, and neurodegenerative disorders, and there is evidence that specific cognitive training may be effective in cognitive rehabilitation. Several investigations emphasize the fact that interacting with cortical activity, by means of cortical stimulation, can positively affect the short-term cognitive performance and improve the rehabilitation potential of neurologic patients. In this respect, preliminary evidence suggests that cortical stimulation may play a role in treating aphasia, unilateral neglect, and other cognitive disorders. Several possible mechanisms can account for the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive performance. They all reflect the potential of these methods to improve the subject's ability to relearn or to acquire new strategies for carrying out behavioral tasks. The responsible mechanisms remain unclear but they are most likely related to the activation of impeded pathways or inhibition of maladaptive responses. Modifications of the brain activity may assist relearning by facilitating local activity or by suppressing interfering activity from other brain areas. Notwithstanding the promise of these preliminary findings, to date no systematic application of these methods to neurorehabilitation research has been reported. Considering the potential benefit of these interventions, further studies taking into consideration large patient populations, long treatment periods, or the combination of different rehabilitation strategies are needed. Brain stimulation is indeed an exciting opportunity in the field of cognitive neurorehabilitation, which is clearly in need of further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20633391     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  57 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and perspectives for the future.

Authors:  Catarina Freitas; Helena Mondragón-Llorca; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  rTMS stimulation on left DLPFC increases the correct recognition of memories for emotional target and distractor words.

Authors:  Michela Balconi; Chiara Ferrari
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology: A review of established and prospective applications.

Authors:  Mark C Eldaief; Daniel Z Press; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-12

4.  Effects of low versus high frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function and cortical excitability in Alzheimer's dementia.

Authors:  Mohamed A Ahmed; Esam S Darwish; Eman M Khedr; Yasser M El Serogy; Anwer M Ali
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the supplementary motor area (SMA) influences performance on motor tasks.

Authors:  K E Hupfeld; C J Ketcham; H D Schneider
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The neural underpinnings of cross-cultural differences in creativity.

Authors:  Tal Ivancovsky; Oded Kleinmintz; Joo Lee; Jenny Kurman; Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Emotional face recognition, empathic trait (BEES), and cortical contribution in response to positive and negative cues. The effect of rTMS on dorsal medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Michela Balconi; Adriana Bortolotti
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 8.  Can noninvasive brain stimulation enhance cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders?

Authors:  Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede; Andrew M Vahabzadeh-Hagh; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  A double-blind, sham-controlled, pilot study to assess the effects of the concomitant use of transcranial direct current stimulation with the computer assisted cognitive rehabilitation to the prefrontal cortex on cognitive functions in patients with stroke.

Authors:  See-Hyun Park; Eun-Jeong Koh; Ha-Young Choi; Myoung-Hwan Ko
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-12-31

Review 10.  Noninvasive techniques for probing neurocircuitry and treating illness: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Authors:  Mark S George; Gary Aston-Jones
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.