Literature DB >> 20633321

UK survey of the present role of ear, nose and throat surgeons in lacrimal surgery.

Salim Al-Shaikh1, Faisal Javed, Gregory Fincham, Mohamed Latif, Mahmood Bhutta.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the current involvement of ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgeons in lacrimal surgery. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A postal survey was distributed to 796 practicing UK consultant otorhinolaryngologists listed at the drfoster website.
RESULTS: Overall, 531 questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 66.7%. Of these, 108 (20.6%) respondents indicated they were involved in lacrimal surgery. The majority of otolaryngologists seem to work in collaboration with ophthalmologists. In our survey, 98% (106) perform endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Most respondents believed lacrimal intubation and dilation to have limited success, endoscopic DCR to have moderate success and external DCR to have high success.
CONCLUSIONS: Lacrimal surgery is carried out in a spirit of collaboration with ophthalmologists rather than competition. Endoscopic DCR is the favoured surgical procedure of otolaryngologists. The perceived success rate for endoscopic DCR reported in this survey coincides with that reported in the literature.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20633321      PMCID: PMC3229349          DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12699663904394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  12 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts in lacrimal drainage surgery.

Authors:  R P Yeatts
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 2.  Dacryocystorhinostomy. Diagnosis and treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstructions.

Authors:  M Onerci
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 3.  Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps.

Authors:  Angelo Tsirbas; Peter John Wormald
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 4.  Acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  David M Mills; Dale R Meyer
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Long term follow up of nasolacrimal intubation in adults.

Authors:  P P Connell; T P Fulcher; E Chacko; M J O' Connor; P Moriarty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Endoscopic laser-assisted lacrimal surgery.

Authors:  R S Gonnering; D B Lyon; J C Fisher
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Scarring in external dacryocystorhinostomy: fact or fiction?

Authors:  R H Caesar; G Fernando; K Scott; A A McNab
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2005-06

8.  Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Peter J Dolman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Cost-efficiency of endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  S Anari; G Ainsworth; A K Robson
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 1.469

10.  Endoscopic 'cold steel' versus laser dacryocystorhinostomy: completing the audit cycle.

Authors:  S E Lester; A K Robson; M Bearn
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.469

View more
  2 in total

1.  An appraisal of the utility or futility of ENT consultant postal questionnaires.

Authors:  Stephen Ryan; J Saunders; E Clarke; J E Fenton
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Results of Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy; Necessity of Teamwork and Patient Selection.

Authors:  Reza Erfanian Salim; Shabahang Mohammadi
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2015
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.