Literature DB >> 16191793

Scarring in external dacryocystorhinostomy: fact or fiction?

R H Caesar1, G Fernando, K Scott, A A McNab.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine patients' long-term satisfaction with external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) with respect to the visibility of the scar and the resolution of symptoms.
METHOD: A single postal questionnaire with stamped addressed envelope for reply was sent to 204 sequential external primary DCR patients operated on by AAM from January 1999 to April 2002.
RESULTS: Of the 79% who replied, 67% rated the scar as invisible with 97% happy with the scar. In 92% the epiphora was either improved or cured and 85% would recommend the operation. Younger patients were significantly more likely to rate the scar as visible but equally likely to rate the scar as good or better. Women were no more likely than men to rate the scar as visible, but if visible, were more likely to consider the scar poor.
CONCLUSIONS: There was an excellent response rate for a single questionnaire. Patient satisfaction with the DCR scar is very high, with the majority considering the scar invisible. Only 3% remained unhappy with the scar. Overall patient satisfaction with external DCR is very high, for the majority of patients the procedure is effective, and 85% would recommend the operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16191793     DOI: 10.1080/01676830590926567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orbit        ISSN: 0167-6830


  9 in total

1.  UK survey of the present role of ear, nose and throat surgeons in lacrimal surgery.

Authors:  Salim Al-Shaikh; Faisal Javed; Gregory Fincham; Mohamed Latif; Mahmood Bhutta
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  [Significance of transcanalicular laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy in modern lacrimal drainage surgery].

Authors:  K R Koch; H Kühner; C Cursiefen; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Aesthetic assessment in periciliary "v-incision" versus conventional external dacryocystorhinostomy in Asians.

Authors:  Danny Siu-Chun Ng; Edwin Chan; Derek Kim-Hun Yu; Simon Tak-Chuen Ko
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  [Minimally invasive bypass surgery for nasolacrimal duct obstruction : Transcanalicular laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy].

Authors:  K R Koch; C Cursiefen; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Cosmetic evaluation of surgical scars after external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Syed Ali Raza Rizvi; Mohammad Saquib; Rakesh Maheshwari; Yogesh Gupta; Zafar Iqbal; Puneet Maheshwari
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: an audit of 104 patients.

Authors:  Joel M Mor; Mario Matthaei; Holger Schrumpf; Konrad R Koch; Edwin Bölke; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.175

7.  Comparison of the effect of W-shaped and linear skin incisions on scar visibility in bilateral external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Metin Ekinci; Halil Hüseyin Caǧatay; Gokcen Gokce; Erdinç Ceylan; Sadullah Keleş; Ozgür Cakici; Mehmet Ersin Oba; Zeliha Yazar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-20

8.  The cosmetic outcome of external dacryocystorhinostomy scar and factors affecting it.

Authors:  Mostafa A Waly; Osama E Shalaby; Molham A Elbakary; Aiman A Hashish
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Cutaneous scar visibility after external dacryocystorhinostomy: A comparison of curvilinear and W shaped incision.

Authors:  Bhagwati Wadwekar; Amod Hansdak; Surendra D Nirmale; Kandasamy Ravichandran
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.