Literature DB >> 20632087

An assessment of benthic condition in several small watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay, USA.

Andrew K Leight1, Ward H Slacum, Ed F Wirth, Mike H Fulton.   

Abstract

We examined benthic condition in three small watersheds in the Chesapeake Bay. Characterization of benthic condition was based on the combined measurements of benthic fauna, sediment toxicity, and sediment contaminant loads. Significant differences between watersheds were detected for sediment contaminant concentrations and water quality. The intensity of benthic impairment was greatest in the river surrounded by the most developed watershed. Spatial patterns of benthic condition were detected within all three watersheds. In contrast to current, intense focus on nutrient pollution in the Chesapeake Bay, qualitative comparison of our findings to land-use patterns supports findings of other studies that suggest benthic condition in tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay may more closely relate to urbanization than agricultural land uses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20632087     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1599-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

1.  Incidence of stress in benthic communities along the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts within different ranges of sediment contamination from chemical mixtures.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Hyland; W Leonard Balthis; Virginia D Engle; Edward R Long; John F Paul; J Kevin Summers; Robert F Van Dolah
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Application of the benthic index of biotic integrity to environmental monitoring in Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  Roberto J Llansó; Daniel M Dauer; Jon H Vølstad; Lisa C Scott
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Agricultural pesticides and selected degradation products in five tidal regions and the main stem of Chesapeake Bay, USA.

Authors:  Laura L McConnell; Clifford P Rice; Cathleen J Hapeman; Leticia Drakeford; Jennifer A Harman-Fetcho; Krystyna Bialek; Michael H Fulton; Andrew K Leight; Gregory Allen
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Development and evaluation of a spatially-explicit index of Chesapeake Bay health.

Authors:  Michael Williams; Ben Longstaff; Claire Buchanan; Roberto Llansó; William Dennison
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 5.553

5.  Watershed land use is strongly linked to PCBs in white perch in Chesapeake Bay subestuaries.

Authors:  Ryan S King; Joseph R Beaman; Dennis F Whigham; Anson H Hines; Matthew E Baker; Donald E Weller
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Landscape metrics and estuarine sediment contamination in the mid-Atlantic and southern New England regions.

Authors:  John F Paul; Randy L Comeleo; Jane Copeland
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.751

7.  Environmental fate of roxarsone in poultry litter. Part II. Mobility of arsenic in soils amended with poultry litter.

Authors:  D W Rutherford; A J Bednar; J R Garbarino; R Needham; K W Staver; R L Wershaw
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  A ten year summary of concurrent ambient water column and sediment toxicity tests in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: 1990-1999.

Authors:  Lenwood W Hall; Ronald D Anderson; Raymond W Alden
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.513

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.