Literature DB >> 19117579

Development and evaluation of a spatially-explicit index of Chesapeake Bay health.

Michael Williams1, Ben Longstaff, Claire Buchanan, Roberto Llansó, William Dennison.   

Abstract

In an effort to better portray changing health conditions in Chesapeake Bay and support restoration efforts, a Bay Health Index (BHI) was developed to assess the ecological effects of nutrient and sediment loading on 15 regions of the estuary. Three water quality and three biological measures were combined to formulate the BHI. Water quality measures of chlorophyll-a, dissolved oxygen, and Secchi depth were averaged to create the Water Quality Index (WQI), and biological measures of the phytoplankton and benthic indices of biotic integrity (P-IBI and B-IBI, respectively) and the area of submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) were averaged to create the Biotic Index (BI). The WQI and BI were subsequently averaged to give a BHI value representing ecological conditions over the growing season (i.e., March-October). Lower chlorophyll-a concentrations, higher dissolved oxygen concentrations, deeper Secchi depths, higher phytoplankton and benthic indices relative to ecological health-based thresholds, and more extensive SAV area relative to restoration goal areas, characterized the least-impaired regions. The WQI, P-IBI and BHI were significantly correlated with (1) regional river flow (r=-0.64, -0.57 and -0.49, respectively; p<0.01), (2) nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and sediment loads (all positively correlated with flow), and (3) the sum of developed and agricultural land use (highest annual r(2)=0.86, 0.71 and 0.68, respectively) in most reporting regions, indicating that the BHI is strongly regulated by nutrient and sediment loads from these land uses. The BHI uses ecological health-based thresholds that give an accurate representation of the health conditions in Chesapeake Bay and was the basis for an annual, publicly released environmental report card that debuted in 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19117579     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  5 in total

1.  An assessment of benthic condition in several small watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay, USA.

Authors:  Andrew K Leight; Ward H Slacum; Ed F Wirth; Mike H Fulton
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Freshwater lake ecosystem health assessment and its response to pollution stresses based on planktonic index of biotic integrity.

Authors:  Huayong Zhang; Zhengda Duan; Zhongyu Wang; Meifang Zhong; Wang Tian; Hualin Wang; Hai Huang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Development of a multimetric water quality Indicator for tracking progress towards the achievement of Chesapeake Bay water quality standards.

Authors:  Ana L Hernandez Cordero; Peter J Tango; Richard A Batiuk
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Conceptual Framework for Assessing Ecosystem Health.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Larry D McKinney; John W Tunnell; William C Dennison; R Heath Kelsey; Kiersten M Stanzel; Gregory W Stunz; Kim Withers; Jace Tunnell
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  Using Socioenvironmental Report Cards as a Tool for Transdisciplinary Collaboration.

Authors:  Vanessa Vargas-Nguyen; R Heath Kelsey; Harald Jordahl; William Nuttle; Charles Somerville; Jane Thomas; William C Dennison
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.992

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.