BACKGROUND: There is continuing controversy whether long-distance running results in irreversible articular cartilage damage. New quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques used at 3.0 T have been developed including T1rho (T1ρ) and T2 relaxation time measurements that detect early cartilage proteoglycan and collagen breakdown. HYPOTHESIS: Marathon runners will demonstrate T1ρ and T2 changes in articular cartilage on MRI after a marathon, which are not seen in nonrunners. These changes are reversible. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Ten asymptomatic marathon runners had 3-T knee MRI scans 2 weeks before, within 48 hours after, and 10 to 12 weeks after running a marathon. The T1ρ and T2 MRI sequences in runners were compared with those of 10 age- and gender-matched controls who had MRI performed at baseline and 10 to 12 weeks. RESULTS: Runners did not demonstrate any gross morphologic MRI changes after running a marathon. Postmarathon studies, however, revealed significantly higher T2 and T1ρ values in all articular cartilage areas of the knee (P < .01) except the lateral compartment. The T2 values recovered to baseline except in the medial femoral condyle after 3 months. Average T1ρ values increased after the marathon from 37.0 to 38.9 (P < .001) and remained increased at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Runners showed elevated T1ρ and T2 values after a marathon, suggesting biochemical changes in articular cartilage, T1ρ values remain elevated after 3 months of reduced activity. The patellofemoral joint and medial compartment of the knee show the highest signal changes, suggesting they are at higher risk for degeneration.
BACKGROUND: There is continuing controversy whether long-distance running results in irreversible articular cartilage damage. New quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques used at 3.0 T have been developed including T1rho (T1ρ) and T2 relaxation time measurements that detect early cartilage proteoglycan and collagen breakdown. HYPOTHESIS: Marathon runners will demonstrate T1ρ and T2 changes in articular cartilage on MRI after a marathon, which are not seen in nonrunners. These changes are reversible. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Ten asymptomatic marathon runners had 3-T knee MRI scans 2 weeks before, within 48 hours after, and 10 to 12 weeks after running a marathon. The T1ρ and T2 MRI sequences in runners were compared with those of 10 age- and gender-matched controls who had MRI performed at baseline and 10 to 12 weeks. RESULTS: Runners did not demonstrate any gross morphologic MRI changes after running a marathon. Postmarathon studies, however, revealed significantly higher T2 and T1ρ values in all articular cartilage areas of the knee (P < .01) except the lateral compartment. The T2 values recovered to baseline except in the medial femoral condyle after 3 months. Average T1ρ values increased after the marathon from 37.0 to 38.9 (P < .001) and remained increased at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Runners showed elevated T1ρ and T2 values after a marathon, suggesting biochemical changes in articular cartilage, T1ρ values remain elevated after 3 months of reduced activity. The patellofemoral joint and medial compartment of the knee show the highest signal changes, suggesting they are at higher risk for degeneration.
Authors: Richard B Souza; Thomas Baum; Samuel Wu; Brian T Feeley; Nancy Kadel; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Karupppasamy Subburaj; Deepak Kumar; Richard B Souza; Hamza Alizai; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Theresa Diermeier; Knut Beitzel; Laura Bachmann; Wolf Petersen; Katrin Esefeld; Klaus Wörtler; Andreas B Imhoff; Andrea Achtnich Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Keiko Amano; Janet L Huebner; Thomas V Stabler; Matthew Tanaka; Charles E McCulloch; Iryna Lobach; Nancy E Lane; Virginia B Kraus; C Benjamin Ma; Xiaojuan Li Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Richard B Souza; Charles Fang; Anthony Luke; Samuel Wu; Xiaojuan Li; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2011-11-25 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: W Lin; H Alizai; G B Joseph; W Srikhum; M C Nevitt; J A Lynch; C E McCulloch; T M Link Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Leonie Waldenmeier; Christoph Evers; Michael Uder; Rolf Janka; Frank Friedrich Hennig; Milena L Pachowsky; Götz Hannes Welsch Journal: Cartilage Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: George P Pappas; Melissa A Vogelsong; Ernesto Staroswiecki; Garry E Gold; Marc R Safran Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 3.638