Literature DB >> 20630361

The impact of obesity on gynecologic cancer screening: an integrative literature review.

Tess Aldrich, Barbara Hackley.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Evidence indicates lower rates of breast and cervical cancer screening among obese compared to nonobese women. This integrative review examines the association between gynecologic cancer screening and body weight, as well as potential barriers to screening.
METHODS: A literature search of standard computerized databases was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published between 1950 and January 2009.
RESULTS: Twenty-three studies met the criteria for review. Of the 17 studies that evaluated rates of cervical cancer screening, 13 found obese women significantly less likely than their nonobese counterparts to have had a recent Papanicolaou test, a trend that was stronger in white women when compared to African American women. Eight of the 15 studies examining routine mammography found an inverse association between increasing body weight and recent screening, although findings generally pertained only to women who were white and/or severely obese. Possible barriers to care included embarrassment and perceived weight stigma in the clinical setting, lack of appropriately sized examination equipment, and poor patient-provider communication. DISCUSSION: Further research is needed to clarify the challenges that obese women face in accessing care and to evaluate strategies such as ensuring the availability of appropriate equipment and supplies, the use of alternative screening methodologies, and more culturally sensitive counseling approaches that may improve screening rates in obese women. Copyright 2010 American College of Nurse-Midwives. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630361     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  20 in total

1.  Obesity Stigma and Bias.

Authors:  Sharon M Fruh; Joe Nadglowski; Heather R Hall; Sara L Davis; Errol D Crook; Kimberly Zlomke
Journal:  J Nurse Pract       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.767

2.  Racial differences in self-reported healthcare seeking and treatment for urinary incontinence in community-dwelling women from the EPI Study.

Authors:  Mitchell B Berger; Divya A Patel; Janis M Miller; John O Delancey; Dee E Fenner
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Periodic screening for breast and cervical cancer in women with diabetes: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Dominika Bhatia; Rinku Sutradhar; Peter C Austin; Vasily Giannakeas; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Lawrence F Paszat; Lorraine L Lipscombe
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Examining delays in diagnosis for slipped capital femoral epiphysis from a health disparities perspective.

Authors:  Maureen Purcell; Rustin Reeves; Matthew Mayfield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Patient and provider factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics serving low-income, urban immigrant Latinos.

Authors:  Maria Lopez-Class; Gheorghe Luta; Anne-Michelle Noone; Janet Canar; Claire Selksy; Elmer Huerta; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

6.  Chronic Comorbidities and Receipt of Breast Cancer Screening in United States and Foreign-Born Women: Data from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Leslie E Cofie; Jacqueline M Hirth; Abbey B Berenson; Rebeca Wong
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Usefulness of serum mass spectrometry to identify women diagnosed with higher grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia may differ by race.

Authors:  Roland Matthews; Andres Azuero; Senait Asmellash; Earl Brewster; Edward E Partridge; Chandrika J Piyathilake
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-07-12

8.  Obese women's barriers to mammography and pap smear: the possible role of personality.

Authors:  Asia M Friedman; Jennifer R Hemler; Elisa Rossetti; Lynn P Clemow; Jeanne M Ferrante
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Mild obesity, physical activity, calorie intake, and the risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jae Kwan Lee; Kyeong A So; Chandrika J Piyathilake; Mi Kyung Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Implicit and explicit weight bias in a national sample of 4,732 medical students: the medical student CHANGES study.

Authors:  Sean M Phelan; John F Dovidio; Rebecca M Puhl; Diana J Burgess; David B Nelson; Mark W Yeazel; Rachel Hardeman; Sylvia Perry; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.