Literature DB >> 20630126

Vaccine effectiveness in pandemic influenza - primary care reporting (VIPER): an observational study to assess the effectiveness of the pandemic influenza A (H1N1)v vaccine.

C R Simpson1, L D Ritchie, C Robertson, A Sheikh, J McMenamin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine influenza A (H1N1)v vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the Scottish population at an early stage of the 2009-10 H1N1v vaccination programme, using a sentinel surveillance network of 41 general practices contributing to the Practice Team Information (PTI) network.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using record linkage. Using the Community Health Index (CHI) number, general practice patient-level data were extracted and linked to the Scottish Morbidity Record (SMR) catalogue, containing information on all inpatient hospitalisations in Scotland. The Health Protection Scotland (HPS) data set was also used, consisting of laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza A (H1N1)v from the practices. The study involved a longitudinal evaluation of the aspect of the influenza A (H1N1)v vaccination programme implemented through general practice in autumn/winter 2009.
RESULTS: At 25 December 2009, vaccine uptake estimates for the study population were 12.0% (95% CI 11.9 to 12.1). For those patients in an at-risk group (n = 59,721), the uptake rate was 37.5% (95% CI 37.1 to 37.9). Among the 1492 patients swabbed, 467 were positive for H1N1, giving a positivity rate of 31.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 29.0 to 33.7]. Among those in a clinical risk group who were not vaccinated, 41.3% (95% CI 35.6 to 46.9) tested positive for influenza A (H1N1)v, a significant difference from the H1N1 positivity percentage among patients with no clinical risk (p < 0.01). Among those vaccinated and in a clinical risk group, only one patient (5%, 95% CI 0.3 to 23.6) tested after vaccination was positive for influenza A (H1N1)v. By comparing postvaccination swabs in those who were vaccinated with swabs taken in those who remained unvaccinated, the VE was found to be 95.0% (95% CI 76.0 to 100.0). In the study population there were 2739 admissions to hospital, of which 1241 were emergency admissions; all 48 emergency hospitalisations for influenza and pneumonia occurred in patients who did not receive the vaccine. VE for single or combined end points of influenza and pneumonia hospitalisation for all patients was estimated at 100.0% (95% CI infinity to 100.0). There were 132 hospitalisations in the unvaccinated group versus five in the vaccinated group for cardiovascular-related conditions. There were 193 hospitalisations in the unvaccinated group versus nine in those vaccinated in the group of patients admitted for influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular-related conditions. VE for cardiovascular-related conditions alone, or in individuals with influenza, pneumonia COPD and cardiovascular-related conditions, was 71.1% (95% CI 11.3 to 90.6) and 64.7% (95% CI 12.0 to 85.8) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from swabs submitted from patients in the cohort who presented in general practice with influenza-like illness suggests that the introduction of influenza A (H1N1)v vaccine in Scotland during 2009 was associated with a high degree of protection. Influenza A (H1N1)v immunisation in primary health-care settings appears to be both effective and widely acceptable, and should continue to be the mainstay of disease prevention for at-risk patients. A further analysis encompassing the whole influenza season is required to cover more days of vaccination exposure and increase precision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630126     DOI: 10.3310/hta14340-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  26 in total

1.  Usefulness of health registries when estimating vaccine effectiveness during the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic in Norway.

Authors:  Bernardo Rafael Guzmán Herrador; Preben Aavitsland; Berit Feiring; Marianne A Riise Bergsaker; Katrine Borgen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.090

2.  Vaccine effectiveness of live attenuated and trivalent inactivated influenza vaccination in 2010/11 to 2015/16: the SIVE II record linkage study.

Authors:  Colin R Simpson; Nazir I Lone; Kim Kavanagh; Tanya Englishby; Chris Robertson; Jim McMenamin; Beatrix von Wissman; Eleftheria Vasileiou; Christopher C Butler; Lewis D Ritchie; Rory Gunson; Jürgen Schwarze; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Preventing Hospitalizations in Older Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Andrea S Gershon; Hannah Chung; Joan Porter; Michael A Campitelli; Sarah A Buchan; Kevin L Schwartz; Natasha S Crowcroft; Aaron Campigotto; Jonathan B Gubbay; Timothy Karnauchow; Kevin Katz; Allison J McGeer; J Dayre McNally; David C Richardson; Susan E Richardson; Laura C Rosella; Andrew E Simor; Marek Smieja; George Zahariadis; Jeffrey C Kwong
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Effectiveness of vaccination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in preventing hospitalization with laboratory confirmed influenza during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 seasons.

Authors:  Angela Domínguez; Jesús Castilla; Pere Godoy; Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Marc Saez; Núria Soldevila; Jenaro Astray; José María Mayoral; Vicente Martín; José María Quintana; Fernando González-Candelas; Juan Carlos Galán; Sonia Tamames; Ady Castro; Maretva Baricot; Olatz Garín; Tomas Pumarola
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Vaccine allocation in a declining epidemic.

Authors:  E Goldstein; J Wallinga; M Lipsitch
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Prospective hospital-based case-control study to assess the effectiveness of pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccination and risk factors for hospitalization in 2009-2010 using matched hospital and test-negative controls.

Authors:  Wiebke Hellenbrand; Pernille Jorgensen; Brunhilde Schweiger; Gerhard Falkenhorst; Matthias Nachtnebel; Benedikt Greutélaers; Christian Traeder; Ole Wichmann
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Field effectiveness of pandemic and 2009-2010 seasonal vaccines against 2009-2010 A(H1N1) influenza: estimations from surveillance data in France.

Authors:  Camille Pelat; Alessandra Falchi; Fabrice Carrat; Anne Mosnier; Isabelle Bonmarin; Clément Turbelin; Sophie Vaux; Sylvie van der Werf; Jean Marie Cohen; Bruno Lina; Thierry Blanchon; Thomas Hanslik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effectiveness of AS03 adjuvanted pandemic H1N1 vaccine: case-control evaluation based on sentinel surveillance system in Canada, autumn 2009.

Authors:  Danuta M Skowronski; Naveed Z Janjua; Gaston De Serres; Travis S Hottes; James A Dickinson; Natasha Crowcroft; Trijntje L Kwindt; Patrick Tang; Hugues Charest; Kevin Fonseca; Jonathan B Gubbay; Nathalie Bastien; Yan Li; Martin Petric
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-02-03

9.  Ethnic variations in morbidity and mortality from lower respiratory tract infections: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Colin R Simpson; Markus Fc Steiner; Genevieve Cezard; Narinder Bansal; Colin Fischbacher; Anne Douglas; Raj Bhopal; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Effectiveness of MF59™ adjuvanted influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine in risk groups in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Leonoor Wijnans; Jeanne Dieleman; Bettie Voordouw; Miriam Sturkenboom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.