Kenneth H Brown1, K Michael Hambidge, Peter Ranum. 1. Program in International and Community Nutrition, Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA. khbrown@ucdavis.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Zinc fortification is recommended as an appropriate strategy to enhance population zinc status, but guidelines are needed on the appropriate types and levels of zinc fortification of cereal flours for mass fortification programs. OBJECTIVE: To review available information on the scientific rationale, efficacy, and effectiveness of zinc fortification programs, and to develop guidelines on appropriate levels of fortification of cereal flours, based on simulations of the amount of zinc absorbed under different dietary conditions and information on possible adverse effects. METHODS: Systematic review of scientific literature and application of an existing prediction equation to estimate zinc absorption. RESULTS: Previously completed research demonstrates that zinc intake and absorption are increased when zinc-fortified foods are consumed, but little information is, as yet, available on the biologic impact of large-scale fortification programs. Studies suggest that there are no disadvantages of the recommended ranges of zinc fortification with regard to the sensory properties of zinc-fortified foods, and most research indicates that there are no adverse effects of zinc fortification on the utilization of other minerals. CONCLUSIONS: Zinc fortification of cereal flour is a safe and appropriate strategy for enhancing the zinc status of population subgroups who consume adequate amounts of fortified cereal flour, although additional information is needed to confirm the efficacy and effectiveness of large-scale zinc fortification programs to control zinc deficiency. The appropriate level of fortification depends on the population subgroup, their usual amount of flour intake, the degree of milling and fermentation that is practiced, and the usual intakes of zinc and phytate from other food sources. Fortification recommendations are presented for different dietary scenarios.
BACKGROUND: Zinc fortification is recommended as an appropriate strategy to enhance population zinc status, but guidelines are needed on the appropriate types and levels of zinc fortification of cereal flours for mass fortification programs. OBJECTIVE: To review available information on the scientific rationale, efficacy, and effectiveness of zinc fortification programs, and to develop guidelines on appropriate levels of fortification of cereal flours, based on simulations of the amount of zinc absorbed under different dietary conditions and information on possible adverse effects. METHODS: Systematic review of scientific literature and application of an existing prediction equation to estimate zinc absorption. RESULTS: Previously completed research demonstrates that zinc intake and absorption are increased when zinc-fortified foods are consumed, but little information is, as yet, available on the biologic impact of large-scale fortification programs. Studies suggest that there are no disadvantages of the recommended ranges of zinc fortification with regard to the sensory properties of zinc-fortified foods, and most research indicates that there are no adverse effects of zinc fortification on the utilization of other minerals. CONCLUSIONS: Zinc fortification of cereal flour is a safe and appropriate strategy for enhancing the zinc status of population subgroups who consume adequate amounts of fortified cereal flour, although additional information is needed to confirm the efficacy and effectiveness of large-scale zinc fortification programs to control zinc deficiency. The appropriate level of fortification depends on the population subgroup, their usual amount of flour intake, the degree of milling and fermentation that is practiced, and the usual intakes of zinc and phytate from other food sources. Fortification recommendations are presented for different dietary scenarios.
Authors: K Michael Hambidge; Leland V Miller; Jamie E Westcott; Xiaoyang Sheng; Nancy F Krebs Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Prosper Kujinga; Karin J Borgonjen-van den Berg; Cecilia Superchi; Hermine J Ten Hove; Elizabeth Opiyo Onyango; Pauline Andang'o; Valeria Galetti; Michael B Zimmerman; Diego Moretti; Inge D Brouwer Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: M Brnić; R F Hurrell; L T Songré-Ouattara; B Diawara; A Kalmogho-Zan; C Tapsoba; C Zeder; R Wegmüller Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Arnaud Laillou; Le Bach Mai; Le Thi Hop; Nguyen Cong Khan; Dora Panagides; Frank Wieringa; Jacques Berger; Regina Moench-Pfanner Journal: Nutrients Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Arnaud Laillou; Jacques Berger; Bach Mai Le; Van Thuy Pham; Thi Hop Le; Cong Khan Nguyen; Dora Panagides; Fabian Rohner; Frank Wieringa; Regina Moench-Pfanner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240