Literature DB >> 20629095

Feasibility of differential diagnosis of kidney tumors by comparative genomic hybridization of fine needle aspiration biopsies.

Joana Vieira1, Rui Henrique, Franclim R Ribeiro, João D Barros-Silva, Ana Peixoto, Catarina Santos, Manuela Pinheiro, Vera L Costa, Maria J Soares, Jorge Oliveira, Carmen Jerónimo, Manuel R Teixeira.   

Abstract

The association of a genetic analysis that could improve the diagnostic accuracy of renal cell tumors in biopsy samples would allow better-informed therapeutic decisions. We performed comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) on an ex vivo fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy and a tumor fragment obtained from 75 patients consecutively diagnosed with renal tumors and subjected to radical nephrectomy. The pattern of genomic changes by CGH was used blindly to classify the renal tumors and the genetic findings were subsequently compared with the histopathologic diagnosis. In particular cases, including in two carcinomas with morphologically distinct tumor areas, we performed FISH with several locus-specific probes, and looked for VHL point mutations, exonic rearrangements, or promoter methylation. CGH was successful in 82.7% FNA biopsies and in 96% tumor fragments, with the former allowing genetic diagnosis in 75% of renal cell tumors. The genetic and the initial histological classification differed in two renal neoplasias, but the genetic diagnosis was confirmed after review. The genetic pattern correctly diagnosed 93.5% of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC), 61.5% of chromophobe RCC, 100% of papillary RCC, and 14.3% of oncocytomas, with the negative predictive value being 93.9, 90.7, 100, and 90.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value and specificity of copy number profiles was 100%. We demonstrate that genetic diagnosis by CGH on FNA biopsies can improve differential diagnosis in patients with kidney tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20629095     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  13 in total

1.  Morphological, immunohistochemical, and chromosomal analysis of multicystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, an architecturally unusual challenging variant.

Authors:  Maria Pané Foix; Ana Dunatov; Petr Martinek; Enric Condom Mundó; Saul Suster; Maris Sperga; Jose I Lopez; Monika Ulamec; Stela Bulimbasic; Delia Perez Montiel; Reza Alaghehbandan; Kvetoslava Peckova; Krystina Pivovarcikova; Daum Ondrej; Pavla Rotterova; Faruk Skenderi; Kristyna Prochazkova; Martin Dusek; Milan Hora; Michal Michal; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Expression of histone methyltransferases as novel biomarkers for renal cell tumor diagnosis and prognostication.

Authors:  Ana Sílvia Pires-Luís; Márcia Vieira-Coimbra; Filipa Quintela Vieira; Pedro Costa-Pinheiro; Rui Silva-Santos; Paula C Dias; Luís Antunes; Francisco Lobo; Jorge Oliveira; Céline S Gonçalves; Bruno M Costa; Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.528

3.  Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, eosinophilic variant with papillary growth: a case report.

Authors:  Takashi Karashima; Naoto Kuroda; Takahiro Taguchi; Manabu Matsumoto; Makoto Hiroi; Tomoya Nao; Satoshi Fukata; Keiji Inoue; Taro Shuin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-10-01

4.  Chromosomal imbalances revealed in primary renal cell carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Xue-Ling Kang; Hong Zou; Li Juan Pang; Wen Hao Hu; Jin Zhao; Yan Qi; Chun-Xia Liu; Jian Ming Hu; Jing-Xia Tang; Hong An Li; Wei Hua Liang; Xiang-Lin Yuan; Feng Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 5.  Interpretation of needle biopsies of the kidney for investigation of renal masses.

Authors:  Benoît Lhermitte; Laurence de Leval
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma--chromosomal aberration variability and its relation to Paner grading system: an array CGH and FISH analysis of 37 cases.

Authors:  Maris Sperga; Petr Martinek; Tomas Vanecek; Petr Grossmann; Kevin Bauleth; Delia Perez-Montiel; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Kristine Nevidovska; Vilnis Lietuvietis; Milan Hora; Michal Michal; Fredrik Petersson; Naoto Kuroda; Saul Suster; Jindrich Branzovsky; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Cytogenetic and immunohistochemical study of 42 pigmented microcystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (PMChRCC).

Authors:  Francisco Javier Queipo Gutiérrez; Ángel Panizo; Antonio Tienza; Irene Rodriguez; Jesús Javier Sola; Jordi Temprana-Salvador; Inés de Torres; Javier Pardo-Mindán
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Identification of previously unrecognized FAP in children with Gardner fibroma.

Authors:  Joana Vieira; Carla Pinto; Mariana Afonso; Maria do Bom Sucesso; Paula Lopes; Manuela Pinheiro; Isabel Veiga; Rui Henrique; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 9.  Circulating Tumor Cells for the Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Lucile Broncy; Patrizia Paterlini-Bréchot
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-03

10.  Subtyping of renal cortical neoplasms in fine needle aspiration biopsies using a decision tree based on genomic alterations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Banumathy Gowrishankar; Lynnette Cahill; Alexandra E Arndt; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Oscar Lin; Kalyani Chadalavada; Seeta Chaganti; Gouri J Nanjangud; Vundavalli V Murty; Raju S K Chaganti; Victor E Reuter; Jane Houldsworth
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.