Literature DB >> 23913167

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma--chromosomal aberration variability and its relation to Paner grading system: an array CGH and FISH analysis of 37 cases.

Maris Sperga1, Petr Martinek, Tomas Vanecek, Petr Grossmann, Kevin Bauleth, Delia Perez-Montiel, Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero, Kristine Nevidovska, Vilnis Lietuvietis, Milan Hora, Michal Michal, Fredrik Petersson, Naoto Kuroda, Saul Suster, Jindrich Branzovsky, Ondrej Hes.   

Abstract

Genetically, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is characterized by multiple chromosomal changes, especially losses. The most common losses include chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21. The Fuhrman grading system lacks prognostic relevance for ChRCC, and recently, a new grading system for ChRCC was proposed by Paner. The objective of this study was to map the spectrum of chromosomal aberrations (extent and location) in a large cohort of ChRCCs and relate these findings to the Paner grading system (PGS). A large cohort of ChRCC was reviewed and graded according to the PGS. All the cases were reevaluated and separated into groups according to their PGS. The final study set was 37 patients. ChRCCs were divided into PG 1-3, sarcomatoid, and aggressive groups. "Aggressive ChRCCs" were designated cases with known metastatic activity, local recurrence, aggressive growth to the adjacent organs, or invasive growth into the renal sinus (with/without angioinvasion). Sarcomatoid tumors were divided into their epithelial and sarcomatoid component (further molecular genetic analyses were performed separately). Array comparative genome hybridization and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was applied to 42 samples from the 37 cases. Multiple losses, as well as gains, were detected in different chromosomes. Regardless of the PGS groups, the most frequently detected losses involved chromosomes 1 (27/37), 2 (26/37), 6 (23/37), 10 (26/37), 13 (19/37), and 17 (24/37). Loss of chromosome 21 was found in 12/37 cases. The most frequently detected gains were found on chromosomes 4 (22/37), 7 (24/37), 15 (20/37), 19 (22/37), and 20 (21/37). Cluster analysis showed that there is no relation between PGS and particular pattern of chromosomal changes (losses or gains) in ChRCCs. Conclusions are as follows: (1) ChRCCs showed a significantly broader spectrum of chromosomal aberrations than previously recognized. While previously published chromosomal losses were found in our cohort, gains of multiple chromosomes were also identified in a high percentage. The most frequently detected gains involved chromosomes 4, 7, 15, 19, and 20. (2) There is no relation between chromosomal numerical changes and Paner grading system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23913167     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-013-1457-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  28 in total

1.  Histopathologic subtype-specific genomic profiles of renal cell carcinomas identified by high-resolution whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis.

Authors:  Akira Yokomizo; Ken Yamamoto; Kenji Furuno; Masaki Shiota; Katsunori Tatsugami; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Seiji Naito
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  A distinctive translocation carcinoma of the kidney; "rosette forming," t(6;11), HMB45-positive renal tumor: a histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular genetic study of 4 cases.

Authors:  Fredrik Petersson; Tomáš Vaněček; Michal Michal; Guido Martignoni; Matteo Brunelli; Zbyněk Halbhuber; Dominic Spagnolo; Naoto Kuroda; Ximing Yang; Isabel Alvarado Cabrero; Milan Hora; Jindřich Branžovský; Sandra Trivunic; Denisa Kacerovská; Petr Steiner; Ondřej Hes
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with prominent lymph node metastasis and polysomy of chromosome 21: poorly differentiated form or "presarcomatoid" form?

Authors:  Naoto Kuroda; Masato Tamura; Ondrej Hes; Michal Michal; Taro Shuin; Makoto Toi; Yoshihiro Hayashi; Gang-Hong Lee
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  Diagnostic usefulness of fluorescent cytogenetics in differentiating chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma: a validation study combining metaphase and interphase analyses.

Authors:  Matteo Brunelli; Brett Delahunt; Stefano Gobbo; Regina Tardanico; Albino Eccher; Samantha Bersani; Paolo Cossu-Rocca; Claudia Parolini; Piera Balzarini; Fabio Menestrina; Liang Cheng; John Nelson Eble; Guido Martignoni
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Allelic losses at chromosomes 1p, 2p, 6p, 10p, 13q, 17p, and 21q significantly correlate with the chromophobe subtype of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  R F Schwerdtle; S Störkel; C Neuhaus; H Brauch; E Weidt; W Brenner; R Hohenfellner; C Huber; H J Decker
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Genomic expression and single-nucleotide polymorphism profiling discriminates chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma.

Authors:  Min-Han Tan; Chin Fong Wong; Hwei Ling Tan; Ximing J Yang; Jonathon Ditlev; Daisuke Matsuda; Sok Kean Khoo; Jun Sugimura; Tomoaki Fujioka; Kyle A Furge; Eric Kort; Sophie Giraud; Sophie Ferlicot; Philippe Vielh; Delphine Amsellem-Ouazana; Bernard Debré; Thierry Flam; Nicolas Thiounn; Marc Zerbib; Gérard Benoît; Stéphane Droupy; Vincent Molinié; Annick Vieillefond; Puay Hoon Tan; Stéphane Richard; Bin Tean Teh
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Human chromophobe cell renal carcinoma.

Authors:  W Thoenes; S Störkel; H J Rumpelt
Journal:  Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol       Date:  1985

8.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S A Fuhrman; L C Lasky; C Limas
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Virtual-karyotyping with SNP microarrays in morphologically challenging renal cell neoplasms: a practical and useful diagnostic modality.

Authors:  Hyun-Jung Kim; Steven S Shen; Alberto G Ayala; Jae Y Ro; Luan D Truong; Karla Alvarez; Julia A Bridge; Zoran Gatalica; Jill M Hagenkord; José M Gonzalez-Berjon; Federico A Monzon
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  High-resolution DNA copy number and gene expression analyses distinguish chromophobe renal cell carcinomas and renal oncocytomas.

Authors:  Maria V Yusenko; Roland P Kuiper; Tamas Boethe; Börje Ljungberg; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Gyula Kovacs
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  15 in total

1.  Morphological, immunohistochemical, and chromosomal analysis of multicystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, an architecturally unusual challenging variant.

Authors:  Maria Pané Foix; Ana Dunatov; Petr Martinek; Enric Condom Mundó; Saul Suster; Maris Sperga; Jose I Lopez; Monika Ulamec; Stela Bulimbasic; Delia Perez Montiel; Reza Alaghehbandan; Kvetoslava Peckova; Krystina Pivovarcikova; Daum Ondrej; Pavla Rotterova; Faruk Skenderi; Kristyna Prochazkova; Martin Dusek; Milan Hora; Michal Michal; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  "High-grade oncocytic renal tumor": morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 14 cases.

Authors:  Huiying He; Kiril Trpkov; Petr Martinek; Ozlem Tanas Isikci; Cristina Maggi-Galuzzi; Reza Alaghehbandan; Anthony J Gill; Maria Tretiakova; Jose Ignacio Lopez; Sean R Williamson; Delia Perez Montiel; Maris Sperga; Eva Comperat; Fadi Brimo; Ali Yilmaz; Kristyna Pivovarcikova; Kveta Michalova; David Slouka; Kristyna Prochazkova; Milan Hora; Michael Bonert; Michal Michal; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, eosinophilic variant with papillary growth: a case report.

Authors:  Takashi Karashima; Naoto Kuroda; Takahiro Taguchi; Manabu Matsumoto; Makoto Hiroi; Tomoya Nao; Satoshi Fukata; Keiji Inoue; Taro Shuin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-10-01

4.  Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with and without sarcomatoid change: a clinicopathological, comparative genomic hybridization, and whole-exome sequencing study.

Authors:  Yuan Ren; Kunpeng Liu; Xueling Kang; Lijuan Pang; Yan Qi; Zhenyan Hu; Wei Jia; Haijun Zhang; Li Li; Jianming Hu; Weihua Liang; Jin Zhao; Hong Zou; Xianglin Yuan; Feng Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Cytogenetic and immunohistochemical study of 42 pigmented microcystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (PMChRCC).

Authors:  Francisco Javier Queipo Gutiérrez; Ángel Panizo; Antonio Tienza; Irene Rodriguez; Jesús Javier Sola; Jordi Temprana-Salvador; Inés de Torres; Javier Pardo-Mindán
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  "Mucin"-secreting papillary renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic analysis of seven cases.

Authors:  Kristyna Pivovarcikova; Kvetoslava Peckova; Petr Martinek; Delia Perez Montiel; Kristyna Kalusova; Tomas Pitra; Milan Hora; Faruk Skenderi; Monika Ulamec; Ondrej Daum; Pavla Rotterova; Ondrej Ondic; Magdalena Dubova; Romuald Curik; Ana Dunatov; Tomas Svoboda; Michal Michal; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Application and comparison of Fuhrman nuclear grading system with the novel tumor grading system for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and its correlation with disease-specific events.

Authors:  Akash Pramod Sali; Ganesh K Bahirwade; Ganesh Bakshi; Gagan Prakash; Amit Joshi; Sangeeta B Desai; Santosh Menon
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 8.  Modern Pathologic Diagnosis of Renal Oncocytoma.

Authors:  Sara E Wobker; Sean R Williamson
Journal:  J Kidney Cancer VHL       Date:  2017-10-09

Review 9.  Genetic and Chromosomal Aberrations and Their Clinical Significance in Renal Neoplasms.

Authors:  Ning Yi Yap; Retnagowri Rajandram; Keng Lim Ng; Jayalakshmi Pailoor; Ahmad Fadzli; Glenda Carolyn Gobe
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-09-13       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Molecular Genetics of Renal Cell Tumors: A Practical Diagnostic Approach.

Authors:  Reza Alaghehbandan; Delia Perez Montiel; Ana Silvia Luis; Ondrej Hes
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.