Literature DB >> 20627644

How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map.

Glyn Elwyn1, Ilse Kreuwel, Marie Anne Durand, Stephanie Sivell, Natalie Joseph-Williams, Rhodri Evans, Adrian Edwards.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Significant advances have been made in the development of decision support interventions, also called decision aids, for patients facing difficult or uncertain decisions. However, challenges related to the definition, the theoretical underpinnings, the relative contribution of different components and how to migrate these tools to the Internet, remain unresolved. We propose a systematic process map for others to consider as they develop web-based, perhaps multimedia, decision support interventions and to examine the future challenges faced by developers.
METHODS: Based on our experiences of developing and evaluating web-based decision support interventions, we outline a process map to illustrate the general principles of content specification followed by creative design and tailoring to the target audience.
RESULTS: Content specification is fundamental and it should go beyond the traditional emphasis on scientific evidence in order to ensure patients' perspectives on the proposed options. The creative design phase aims to develop a medium to achieve three fundamental tasks: present information; achieve accurate affective forecasting; provide a basis for preference construction. This phase should be an open to experimentation and, where empirical work may be difficult or not yet available, guided by consultation with users, using an iterative method of trial and adaptation.
CONCLUSION: There is little empirical research on how best to achieve these tasks. The guiding principle needs to be one of customising the delivery, based on close consultation with the target users and an iterative development process until the intervention is deemed accessible and useful. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The process map provides a basis for further developments and outlines areas where remaining challenges need further investigation.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20627644     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  50 in total

1.  Do smoking cessation websites meet the needs of smokers with severe mental illnesses?

Authors:  Mary F Brunette; Joelle C Ferron; Timothy Devitt; Pamela Geiger; Wendy M Martin; Sarah Pratt; Meghan Santos; Gregory J McHugo
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2011-10-10

2.  Using nominal group technique to identify barriers, facilitators, and preferences among patients seeking treatment for opioid use disorder: A needs assessment for decision making support.

Authors:  Dharushana Muthulingam; Joshua Bia; Lynn M Madden; Scott O Farnum; Declan T Barry; Frederick L Altice
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2019-01-26

3.  The Voice of the Patient Methodology: A Novel Mixed-Methods Approach to Identifying Treatment Goals for Men with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Sylvia I Lambrechts; V Seenu Srinivasan; Ely Dahan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Development and utilization of complementary communication channels for treatment decision making and survivorship issues among cancer patients: The CIS Research Consortium Experience.

Authors:  Linda Fleisher; Kuang Yi Wen; Suzanne M Miller; Michael Diefenbach; Annette L Stanton; Mary Ropka; Marion Morra; Peter C Raich
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2015-11-01

5.  Developing an Atrial Fibrillation Guideline Support Tool (AFGuST) for shared decision making.

Authors:  Mark H Eckman; Ruth E Wise; Katherine Naylor; Lora Arduser; Gregory Y H Lip; Brett Kissela; Matthew Flaherty; Dawn Kleindorfer; Faisal Khan; Daniel P Schauer; John Kues; Alexandru Costea
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  A stakeholder-driven approach to improve the informed consent process for palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Jennifer K Wind; Elizabeth Frank; Nadine J McCleary; Laura Porter; Heather Cushing; Caroline Abbott; Christine Cronin; Peter C Enzinger; Neal J Meropol; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-03-22

7.  Design and usability of heuristic-based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Odette Wegwarth; Jacky Boivin; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  SCI-U: e-learning for patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

Authors:  John D Shepherd; Karla M Badger-Brown; Matthew S Legassic; Saagar Walia; Dalton L Wolfe
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Application of best practice approaches for designing decision support tools: the preparatory education about clinical trials (PRE-ACT) study.

Authors:  Linda Fleisher; Dominique G Ruggieri; Suzanne M Miller; Sharon Manne; Terrance Albrecht; Joanne Buzaglo; Michael A Collins; Michael Katz; Tyler G Kinzy; Tasnuva Liu; Cheri Manning; Ellen Specker Charap; Jennifer Millard; Dawn M Miller; David Poole; Stephanie Raivitch; Nancy Roach; Eric A Ross; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-04-21

10.  Comparison of prescribing and adherence patterns of anti-osteoporotic medications post-admission for fragility type fracture in an urban teaching hospital and a rural teaching hospital in Ireland between 2005 and 2008.

Authors:  B McGowan; K Bennett; M C Casey; J Doherty; C Silke; B Whelan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.