INTRODUCTION: Faecal incontinence is a prevalent and important condition, with a range of treatment options. Neuromodulation via sacral nerve stimulators is efficacious, but expensive and associated with complications due to device implantation. Peripheral neuromodulation via posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has been assessed in urinary incontinence, but there is minimal evidence for its use in faecal incontinence and no literature from the UK. This retrospective review aimed to assess the efficacy of PTNS in faecal incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen consecutive female patients with faecal incontinence of various causes (9 idiopathic, 3 obstetric, 1 surgery) underwent PTNS at a UK hospital. All were investigated with colonic imaging, anorectal physiology and endo-anal ultrasound. Prior treatments included physiotherapy (13), sphincteroplasty (3) biofeedback (3) and PTQ implants (1). PTNS was performed for 30 min, weekly for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Median monthly episodes of incontinence of wind, liquid and solid reduced from 6, 10 and 18 respectively to 0 with 12 weeks' treatment (P < 0.05). Significant improvements in quality of life indices were also seen. At 1-month follow up, a sustained reduction in incontinence of wind was seen (0 episodes), with non-significant reductions of liquid and solid stool. CONCLUSIONS: PTNS is a potentially efficacious, technically simple and minimally invasive alternative treatment modality for faecal incontinence. These early results are encouraging, but we await medium- and long-term follow-up, and a larger randomised trial comparing PTNS with alternative treatments and placebo.
INTRODUCTION: Faecal incontinence is a prevalent and important condition, with a range of treatment options. Neuromodulation via sacral nerve stimulators is efficacious, but expensive and associated with complications due to device implantation. Peripheral neuromodulation via posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has been assessed in urinary incontinence, but there is minimal evidence for its use in faecal incontinence and no literature from the UK. This retrospective review aimed to assess the efficacy of PTNS in faecal incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen consecutive female patients with faecal incontinence of various causes (9 idiopathic, 3 obstetric, 1 surgery) underwent PTNS at a UK hospital. All were investigated with colonic imaging, anorectal physiology and endo-anal ultrasound. Prior treatments included physiotherapy (13), sphincteroplasty (3) biofeedback (3) and PTQ implants (1). PTNS was performed for 30 min, weekly for 12 weeks. RESULTS: Median monthly episodes of incontinence of wind, liquid and solid reduced from 6, 10 and 18 respectively to 0 with 12 weeks' treatment (P < 0.05). Significant improvements in quality of life indices were also seen. At 1-month follow up, a sustained reduction in incontinence of wind was seen (0 episodes), with non-significant reductions of liquid and solid stool. CONCLUSIONS:PTNS is a potentially efficacious, technically simple and minimally invasive alternative treatment modality for faecal incontinence. These early results are encouraging, but we await medium- and long-term follow-up, and a larger randomised trial comparing PTNS with alternative treatments and placebo.
Authors: T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Vera Vandoninck; Michael R Van Balken; E Finazzi Agró; Filomena Petta; Carlo Caltagirone; John P F A Heesakkers; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Frans M J Debruyne; Bart L H Bemelmans Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: S Perry; C Shaw; C McGrother; R J Matthews; R P Assassa; H Dallosso; K Williams; K R Brittain; U Azam; M Clarke; C Jagger; C Mayne; C M Castleden Journal: Gut Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: W Douglas Wong; Susan M Congliosi; Michael P Spencer; Marvin L Corman; Patrick Tan; Frank G Opelka; Marcus Burnstein; Juan J Nogueras; H Randolph Bailey; Jose Manuel Devesa; Robert D Fry; Burt Cagir; Elisa Birnbaum; James W Fleshman; Mallory A Lawrence; W Donald Buie; John Heine; Peter S Edelstein; Sharon Gregorcyk; Paul Antoine Lehur; Francis Michot; P Terry Phang; David J Schoetz; Fabio Potenti; Josephine Y Tsai Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Michael R van Balken; Vera Vandoninck; Bert J Messelink; Henk Vergunst; John P F A Heesakkers; Frans M J Debruyne; Bart L H Bemelmans Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Alexander Hotouras; Jamie Murphy; Marion Allison; Anne Curry; Norman S Williams; Charles H Knowles; Christopher L Chan Journal: Surg Today Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 2.549
Authors: Nick A Heywood; James S Pearson; James E Nicholson; Clare Molyneux; Abhiram Sharma; Edward S Kiff; Peter J Whorwell; Karen J Telford Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 4.409