Literature DB >> 20626459

Early change detection in humans as revealed by auditory brainstem and middle-latency evoked potentials.

Lavinia Slabu1, Carles Escera, Sabine Grimm, Jordi Costa-Faidella.   

Abstract

The ability to detect unexpected novel stimuli is crucial for survival, as it might urge a prompt adaptive response. Human auditory novelty detection has been associated to the mismatch negativity long-latency auditory-evoked potential, peaking at 100-200 ms. Yet, recent animal studies showing novelty responses at a very short latency (about 20-30 ms) in individual neurons already at the level of the midbrain and thalamus suggest that novelty detection might be a basic principle of the functional organization of the auditory system, expanding from lower levels in the brainstem along the auditory pathway up to higher-order areas of the cerebral cortex. To test this suggestion, we here measured auditory brainstem and middle latency response (MLR) to frequency novel stimuli embedded in an oddball sequence. To oversee refractoriness confounds a 'control block' was used. The results showed that occasional changes in auditory frequency information were detected as early as 30 ms (Pa waveform of the MLR) after stimulus onset. The control block precluded these effects as resulting merely from refractoriness, altogether supporting the notion of 'true' early auditory change detection in humans, matching the latency range of auditory novelty responses described in individual neurons of subhuman species. Our results suggest that auditory change detection of frequency information is a multistage process that occurs at the primary auditory cortex and is transmitted to the higher levels of the auditory pathway.
© 2010 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2010 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20626459     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07324.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  25 in total

1.  Novelty detection in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Lavinia Slabu; Sabine Grimm; Carles Escera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cerebellum, temporal predictability and the updating of a mental model.

Authors:  Sonja A Kotz; Anika Stockert; Michael Schwartze
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Encoding of nested levels of acoustic regularity in hierarchically organized areas of the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Marc Recasens; Sabine Grimm; Andreas Wollbrink; Christo Pantev; Carles Escera
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Specific Early and Late Oddball-Evoked Responses in Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons of Mouse Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  I-Wen Chen; Fritjof Helmchen; Henry Lütcke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Stimulus-specific adaptation in auditory thalamus of young and aged awake rats.

Authors:  Ben D Richardson; Kenneth E Hancock; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Context-dependent plasticity in the subcortical encoding of linguistic pitch patterns.

Authors:  Joseph C Y Lau; Patrick C M Wong; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Stimulus-specific adaptation in the auditory thalamus of the anesthetized rat.

Authors:  Flora M Antunes; Israel Nelken; Ellen Covey; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Topographic distribution, frequency, and intensity dependence of stimulus-specific adaptation in the inferior colliculus of the rat.

Authors:  Daniel Duque; David Pérez-González; Yaneri A Ayala; Alan R Palmer; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Detection of simple and pattern regularity violations occurs at different levels of the auditory hierarchy.

Authors:  Miriam Cornella; Sumie Leung; Sabine Grimm; Carles Escera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Novelty enhances visual perception.

Authors:  Judith Schomaker; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.