Literature DB >> 24996147

Encoding of nested levels of acoustic regularity in hierarchically organized areas of the human auditory cortex.

Marc Recasens1, Sabine Grimm, Andreas Wollbrink, Christo Pantev, Carles Escera.   

Abstract

Our auditory system is able to encode acoustic regularity of growing levels of complexity to model and predict incoming events. Recent evidence suggests that early indices of deviance detection in the time range of the middle-latency responses (MLR) precede the mismatch negativity (MMN), a well-established error response associated with deviance detection. While studies suggest that only the MMN, but not early deviance-related MLR, underlie complex regularity levels, it is not clear whether these two mechanisms interplay during scene analysis by encoding nested levels of acoustic regularity, and whether neuronal sources underlying local and global deviations are hierarchically organized. We registered magnetoencephalographic evoked fields to rapidly presented four-tone local sequences containing a frequency change. Temporally integrated local events, in turn, defined global regularities, which were infrequently violated by a tone repetition. A global magnetic mismatch negativity (MMNm) was obtained at 140-220 ms when breaking the global regularity, but no deviance-related effects were shown in early latencies. Conversely, Nbm (45-55 ms) and Pbm (60-75 ms) deflections of the MLR, and an earlier MMNm response at 120-160 ms, responded to local violations. Distinct neuronal generators in the auditory cortex underlay the processing of local and global regularity violations, suggesting that nested levels of complexity of auditory object representations are represented in separated cortical areas. Our results suggest that the different processing stages and anatomical areas involved in the encoding of auditory representations, and the subsequent detection of its violations, are hierarchically organized in the human auditory cortex.
Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory cortex; beamforming; deviance detection; magnetoencephalographic; middle-latency responses; mismatch negativity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24996147      PMCID: PMC6869685          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  89 in total

1.  Changes in acoustic features and their conjunctions are processed by separate neuronal populations.

Authors:  R Takegata; M Huotilainen; T Rinne; R Näätänen; I Winkler
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-03-05       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of the auditory oddball.

Authors:  B Opitz; A Mecklinger; D Y Von Cramon; F Kruggel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Mechanisms and streams for processing of "what" and "where" in auditory cortex.

Authors:  J P Rauschecker; B Tian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech.

Authors:  Robert J. Zatorre; Pascal Belin; Virginia B. Penhune
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Organization of sequential sounds in auditory memory.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman; Valentina Gumenyuk
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Heschl's gyrus, posterior superior temporal gyrus, and mid-ventrolateral prefrontal cortex have different roles in the detection of acoustic changes.

Authors:  Marc Schönwiesner; Nikolai Novitski; Satu Pakarinen; Synnöve Carlson; Mari Tervaniemi; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects.

Authors:  István Winkler; Susan L Denham; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Sensitivity to complex statistical regularities in rat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Amit Yaron; Itai Hershenhoren; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Processing of complex auditory patterns in musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Bastiaan Boh; Sibylle C Herholz; Claudia Lappe; Christo Pantev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Looking for a pattern: an MEG study on the abstract mismatch negativity in musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Sibylle C Herholz; Claudia Lappe; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  9 in total

1.  Mismatch negativity to pitch pattern deviants in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sarah M Haigh; Mario De Matteis; Brian A Coffman; Timothy K Murphy; Christiana D Butera; Kayla L Ward; Justin R Leiter-McBeth; Dean F Salisbury
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Reduced late mismatch negativity and auditory sustained potential to rule-based patterns in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sarah M Haigh; Brian A Coffman; Timothy K Murphy; Christiana D Butera; Justin R Leiter-McBeth; Dean F Salisbury
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Impairment in predictive processes during auditory mismatch negativity in ScZ: Evidence from event-related fields.

Authors:  Andreas Sauer; Maor Zeev-Wolf; Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Marc Recasens; Catherine Wacongne; Michael Wibral; Saskia Helbling; Abraham Peled; Alexander Grinshpoon; Wolf Singer; Abraham Goldstein; Peter J Uhlhaas
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  The Neuronal Basis of Predictive Coding Along the Auditory Pathway: From the Subcortical Roots to Cortical Deviance Detection.

Authors:  Guillermo V Carbajal; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Reductions in Complex Mismatch Negativity to Extra Tone Gestalt Pattern Deviance in First-Episode Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Dean F Salisbury; Brian A Coffman; Sarah M Haigh
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Arousal State-Dependence of Interactions Between Short- and Long-Term Auditory Novelty Responses in Human Subjects.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Mitchell Steinschneider; Ariane E Rhone; Rashmi N Mueller; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew I Banks
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  Deviance-Related Responses along the Auditory Hierarchy: Combined FFR, MLR and MMN Evidence.

Authors:  Tetsuya Shiga; Heike Althen; Miriam Cornella; Katarzyna Zarnowiec; Hirooki Yabe; Carles Escera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The contribution of frequency-specific activity to hierarchical information processing in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  L Fontolan; B Morillon; C Liegeois-Chauvel; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Neurons along the auditory pathway exhibit a hierarchical organization of prediction error.

Authors:  Gloria G Parras; Javier Nieto-Diego; Guillermo V Carbajal; Catalina Valdés-Baizabal; Carles Escera; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.