BACKGROUND: Neurosurgical trainees regularly encounter critical care situations. Traditionally, education was accomplished through lecture and experience. Increasingly, human patient simulators (HPS) are employed, allowing trainees to sharpen skills in a safe and realistic environment. We describe our experience using HPS in neurosurgical training. METHODS: We developed a critical care training program for residents and medical students using HPS. We used a hi-fidelity, lifelike Human Patient Simulator™ (HPS™) produced by Medical Education Technologies, Inc.™ to simulate realistic scenarios for trainee education. Topics included spinal shock, closed head injury, and cerebral vasospasm. A three-way evaluation model was employed to test validity, including pre- and post-exercise testing, survey feedback, and videotaped replay. The simulation exercises were conducted by a neuro-critical care attending, a senior neurosurgical resident, and a HPS technician. RESULTS: We currently have 29 participants. On a 20-point critical care multiple-choice exam for these participants, average improvement has been 4.5 points or 25%. In subgroup analysis, average improvement was 4.75 points (24%) amongst neurosurgery residents, 3.07 points (18%) amongst neurology residents, 7 points (38%) amongst general surgery residents, and 7 points (38%) amongst senior medical students. Post-exercise evaluations were overwhelmingly positive. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgical critical care education is important for safe and effective care for patients. Clinical experience and didactic lectures help trainees obtain a solid knowledge base, but do not provide the benefit for learning in a fail-safe environment. Through the use of HPS, we have enhanced the critical care education of our trainees.
BACKGROUND: Neurosurgical trainees regularly encounter critical care situations. Traditionally, education was accomplished through lecture and experience. Increasingly, humanpatient simulators (HPS) are employed, allowing trainees to sharpen skills in a safe and realistic environment. We describe our experience using HPS in neurosurgical training. METHODS: We developed a critical care training program for residents and medical students using HPS. We used a hi-fidelity, lifelike HumanPatient Simulator™ (HPS™) produced by Medical Education Technologies, Inc.™ to simulate realistic scenarios for trainee education. Topics included spinal shock, closed head injury, and cerebral vasospasm. A three-way evaluation model was employed to test validity, including pre- and post-exercise testing, survey feedback, and videotaped replay. The simulation exercises were conducted by a neuro-critical care attending, a senior neurosurgical resident, and a HPS technician. RESULTS: We currently have 29 participants. On a 20-point critical care multiple-choice exam for these participants, average improvement has been 4.5 points or 25%. In subgroup analysis, average improvement was 4.75 points (24%) amongst neurosurgery residents, 3.07 points (18%) amongst neurology residents, 7 points (38%) amongst general surgery residents, and 7 points (38%) amongst senior medical students. Post-exercise evaluations were overwhelmingly positive. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgical critical care education is important for safe and effective care for patients. Clinical experience and didactic lectures help trainees obtain a solid knowledge base, but do not provide the benefit for learning in a fail-safe environment. Through the use of HPS, we have enhanced the critical care education of our trainees.
Authors: John R Boulet; David Murray; Joe Kras; Julie Woodhouse; John McAllister; Amitai Ziv Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Geoffrey K Lighthall; Juliana Barr; Steven K Howard; Eran Gellar; Yasser Sowb; Edward Bertacini; David Gaba Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Randolph H Steadman; Wendy C Coates; Yue Ming Huang; Rima Matevosian; Baxter R Larmon; Lynne McCullough; Danit Ariel Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: J M Weller; M Bloch; S Young; M Maze; S Oyesola; J Wyner; D Dob; K Haire; J Durbridge; T Walker; D Newble Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Howard A Schwid; G Alec Rooke; Jan Carline; Randolph H Steadman; W Bosseau Murray; Michael Olympio; Stephen Tarver; Karen Steckner; Susan Wetstone Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Roberta Rehder; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Kristopher Hooten; Peter Weinstock; Joseph R Madsen; Alan R Cohen Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Farzad Moazed; Elaine R Cohen; Nicholas Furiasse; Benjamin Singer; Thomas C Corbridge; William C McGaghie; Diane B Wayne Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2013-09