Literature DB >> 20625843

Assessing the volume-outcome hypothesis and region-level quality improvement interventions: pancreas cancer surgery in two Canadian Provinces.

Marko Simunovic1, David Urbach, Diane Major, Rinku Sutradhar, Nancy Baxter, Teresa To, Adalsteinn Brown, Dave Davis, Mark N Levine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The volume-outcome hypothesis suggests that if increased provider procedure volume is associated with improved patient outcomes, then greater regionalization to high-volume providers should improve region-level outcomes. Quality improvement interventions for pancreas cancer surgery implemented in year 1999 in Ontario, Canada were designed to regionalize surgery to high-volume hospitals and decrease operative mortality. Similar interventions were not used in Quebec, Canada. We assessed the volume-outcome hypothesis and the impact of the Ontario quality improvement interventions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Administrative databases helped identify pancreatic resections from years 1994 to 2004 and relevant patient and hospital characteristics. Hospitals were high-volume if they provided ≥10 procedures in a given calendar year. Outcomes were regionalization of surgery to high-volume providers and rates of operative mortality.
RESULTS: From 1994 to 2004 the percentage of cases in high-volume hospitals increased from 33 to 71% in Ontario and from 36 to 76% in Quebec. Annual rates of operative mortality dropped in Ontario (10.4-2.2% or less) and changed little in Quebec (7.2-9.8%). Changes in measures over time in both provinces were similar before and after year 1999.
CONCLUSIONS: Regionalization was associated with improved operative mortality in Ontario but not in Quebec, undermining the volume-outcome hypothesis. The Ontario quality improvement interventions likely were of little influence since patterns in regionalization and operative mortality were similar before and after year 1999.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20625843     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1114-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center.

Authors:  Adrian M Fox; Kristen Pitzul; Faizal Bhojani; Max Kaplan; Carol-Anne Moulton; Alice C Wei; Ian McGilvray; Sean Cleary; Allan Okrainec
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Health Services Research and Regionalization of Care-From Policy to Practice: the Ontario Experience in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Antoine Eskander; David P Goldstein; Jonathan C Irish
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Centralization of services and reduction of adverse events in pancreatic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Jamie Young; Alistair Thompson; Iain Tait; Lynsey Waugh; Gillian McPhillips
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Impact of surgical experience on management and outcome of pancreatic surgery performed in high- and low-volume centers.

Authors:  Marco Stella; Massimiliano Bissolati; Daniele Gentile; Alessandro Arriciati
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-02-18

Review 5.  Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Daniel J Kagedan; Mahrosh Ahmed; Katharine S Devitt; Alice C Wei
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  The Impact of Increasing Hospital Volume on 90-Day Postoperative Outcomes Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Daniel J Kagedan; Nik Goyert; Qing Li; Lawrence Paszat; Alexander Kiss; Craig C Earle; Paul J Karanicolas; Alice C Wei; Nicole Mittmann; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Economic impacts of care by high-volume providers for non-curative esophagogastric cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Nicole J Look Hong; Victoria Zuk; Laura E Davis; Vaibhav Gupta; Craig C Earle; Nicole Mittmann; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Assessing surgical quality: comparison of general and procedure-specific morbidity estimation models for the risk adjustment of pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes.

Authors:  C Ansorge; P Lindström; L Strömmer; J Blomberg; L Lundell; A Andrén-Sandberg; M Del Chiaro; R Segersvärd
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Variation in receipt of therapy and survival with provider volume for medical oncology in non-curative esophago-gastric cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Laura E Davis; Alyson L Mahar; Ying Liu; Victoria Zuk; Vaibhav Gupta; Craig C Earle; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Spontaneous regionalization of esophageal cancer surgery: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Brian N Arnold; Alexander S Chiu; Jessica R Hoag; Clara H Kim; Michelle C Salazar; Justin D Blasberg; Daniel J Boffa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.