Literature DB >> 20625765

The Simon task with multi-component responses: two loci of response-effect compatibility.

Motonori Yamaguchi1, Robert W Proctor.   

Abstract

The stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effect refers to the phenomenon that responses are faster and more accurate when stimulus and response correspond than when they do not. The phenomenon is robust in that it is observed even when SRC is irrelevant to performing the task, a variant known as the Simon effect. Recent studies also demonstrated that responses are faster when they are spatially compatible with their effects in the environment (action effects) than when they are incompatible. This response-effect (R-E) compatibility effect is thought to stem from the fact that stimuli first activate anticipated effect codes, which then activate corresponding action codes. In the present study, the Simon task was used to examine influences of multiple response components on performance. Three response components were orthogonally manipulated. The results of three experiments indicated that there are two separate processes that are influenced by R-E compatibility; one that is responsible for the SRC effect (S-R translation) and the other that is independent of SRC (action programming). The influence of R-E compatibility on the former process depended on manipulations that varied attentional demands of the task.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20625765     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-010-0299-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  19 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

2.  Compatibility of motion information in two aircraft attitude displays for a tracking task.

Authors:  Motonori Yamaguchi; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2010

3.  Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.

Authors:  Motonori Yamaguchi; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-10-25

4.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

5.  Coding controlled and triggered cursor movements as action effects: influences on the auditory Simon effect for wheel-rotation responses.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Debbie Wang; Robert W Procter; David F Pick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

7.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

8.  Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence.

Authors:  J R Simon; J V Hinrichs; J L Craft
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-10

9.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The lateral coding of rotations: a study of the simon effect with wheel-rotation responses.

Authors:  Y Guiard
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  5 in total

1.  Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Logan Pedersen; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-30

2.  Disentangling task-selection failures from task-execution failures in task switching: an assessment of different paradigms.

Authors:  Luca Moretti; Iring Koch; Marco Steinhauser; Stefanie Schuch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-07-14

3.  How Task Goals Mediate the Interplay between Perception and Action.

Authors:  Pascal Haazebroek; Saskia van Dantzig; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-07

4.  Perception and action as viewed from the Theory of Event Coding: a multi-lab replication and effect size estimation of common experimental designs.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Carina G Giesen; Birte Moeller; David Dignath; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-08-17

Review 5.  Anticipating the magnitude of response outcomes can induce a potentiation effect for manipulable objects.

Authors:  Ronan Guerineau; Loïc P Heurley; Nicolas Morgado; Denis Brouillet; Vincent Dru
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.