Literature DB >> 2062504

Time-related variation in normal automated static perimetry.

A E Searle1, J M Wild, D E Shaw, E C O'Neill.   

Abstract

The effects of phase of eye test and order of eye examined were investigated in 38 normal subjects using a customized 30-point central threshold program of the Humphrey Field Analyzer 640. This program, designed to be completed within 5 minutes, was successively repeated three times for each eye (i.e., three phases for each eye) at two visits separated by an interval of approximately 2 weeks. Both global and pointwise group mean sensitivity decreased in a time-related manner, deterioration being greater for the second eye at each visit, for both 200 ms and 100 ms stimulus durations.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2062504     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32231-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  10 in total

1.  Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter.

Authors:  Andrew John Anderson; Chris A Johnson; Murray Fingeret; John L Keltner; Paul G D Spry; Michael Wall; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Baseline alterations in blue-on-yellow normal perimetric sensitivity.

Authors:  J M Wild; I D Moss
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Evaluation of FASTPAC: a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyser.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; I D Moss; J M Wild; C Hudson; L Prokopich; D Whitaker; E C O'Neill
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Automated perimetry in glaucoma--room for improvement?

Authors:  C O'Brien; J M Wild
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  New approach to estimating variability in visual field data using an image processing technique.

Authors:  D P Crabb; D F Edgar; F W Fitzke; A I McNaught; H P Wynn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Pattern noise (PANO): a new automated functional glaucoma test.

Authors:  Sylvain El-Khoury; Thomas Hannen; Diana Carmen Dragnea; Faustin Ngounou; Paul-Rolf Preußner
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  Retinal Sensitivity Thresholds Obtained Through Easyfield and Humphrey Perimeters in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.

Authors:  Thaissa Nazareth; Janaina Rocha; Ana Luiza B Scoralick; Diego T Dias; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Fabio N Kanadani; Tiago S Prata
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-02

8.  Does eye examination order for standard automated perimetry matter?

Authors:  Stephen R Kelly; Susan R Bryan; David P Crabb
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  Simultaneously performed combined 24-2 and 10-2 visual field tests in glaucoma.

Authors:  Kyoung In Jung; Hee Kyung Ryu; Ki Hoon Hong; Yong Chan Kim; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Real-World Analysis of the Aging Effects on Visual Field Reliability Indices in Humans.

Authors:  Tomoki Shirakami; Tetsuro Omura; Hiroki Fukuda; Ryo Asaoka; Masaki Tanito
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.