Literature DB >> 11281109

The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry.

V A Nguyen1, A W Freeman, P Wenderoth.   

Abstract

Binocular rivalry occurs when the two eyes are presented with incompatible stimuli and the perceived image alternates between the two stimuli. The aim of this study was to find out whether the periodic perceptual loss of a monocular stimulus during binocular rivalry is mirrored by a comparable loss of contrast sensitivity. We presented brief test stimuli to one eye while its conditioning stimulus was dominant or suppressed. The test stimuli were varied widely across four stimulus domains--namely, the relative stimulation of medium- and long-wavelength-sensitive cones, duration, spatial frequency, and grating orientation. The result in each case was the same. Suppression depended slightly or not at all on the type of test stimulus, and contrast sensitivity during suppression was around 64% of that during dominance. The effect of suppression on sensitivity is therefore very weak, relative to its effect on the perceived image. Furthermore, suppression was largely independent of the similarity between the conditioning and the test stimuli, indicating that our results are better explained by eye suppression than by stimulus suppression. A model is presented to account for the small, monocular sensitivity loss during suppression: It assumes that test detection precedes conditioning stimulus perception in the visual pathway.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11281109     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  18 in total

1.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kenith V Sobel; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on initial ocular following responses.

Authors:  Mingxia Zhu; Richard W Hertle; Chang H Kim; Xuefeng Shi; Dongsheng Yang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Global mapping of the whole-brain network underlining binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Masanori Shimono; Kazuhisa Niki
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2013

7.  Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness?

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Jan Brascamp; David J Heeger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Detecting contrast changes in invisible patterns during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Bjorn Hubert-Wallander; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Continuous flash suppression modulates cortical activity in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.