| Literature DB >> 20624292 |
Guangyu Zhao1, Shihui Sun, Lanying Du, Wenjun Xiao, Zhitao Ru, Zhihua Kou, Yan Guo, Hong Yu, Shibo Jiang, Yuchun Lone, Bo-Jian Zheng, Yusen Zhou.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A 2009 global influenza pandemic caused by a novel swine-origin H1N1 influenza A virus has posted an increasing threat of a potential pandemic by the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus, driving us to develop an influenza vaccine which confers cross-protection against both H5N1 and H1N1 viruses. Previously, we have shown that a tetra-branched multiple antigenic peptide (MAP) vaccine based on the extracellular domain of M2 protein (M2e) from H5N1 virus (H5N1-M2e-MAP) induced strong immune responses and cross-protection against different clades of HPAI H5N1 viruses. In this report, we investigated whether such M2e-MAP presenting the H5N1-M2e consensus sequence can afford heterosubtypic protection from lethal challenge with the pandemic 2009 H1N1 virus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20624292 PMCID: PMC2912260 DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Figure 1Structure of the synthetic H5N1-M2e-MAP. The M2e-MAP was synthesized on [Fmoc-Lys(Fmoc)]2-Lys-Cys(Acm)-βAla-Wang Resin in a tetra-branched form, which carries four copies of H5N1-M2e. The amino acid sequences of H5N1-M2e derived from A/Vietnam/1194/04(H5N1) and the H1N1-M2e sequence from A/Beijing/501/09(H1N1) are respectively listed at the bottom of this figure. The difference between H1N1-M2e and H5N1-M2e is bolded and underlined.
Figure 2Cross-reactivity of H5N1-M2e-MAP-induced antibody against H1N1-M2e peptide. Mice were primed and boosted with H5N1-M2e-MAP vaccine and sera were collected as described in Materials and Methods to detect cross-reactivity against H1N1-M2e by ELISA. The end-point titer of each sample was determined as the highest dilution that yielded an OD450 nm value greater than twice of that from pre-vaccination. The data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 10 mice per group. The lower limit of detection (1:20) is indicated by a dotted line. Time points of immunizations are shown as small spots on X-axis, and indicated by arrows at the bottom.
Figure 3Detection of viral titers and histopathological changes in lungs of the H5N1-M2e-MAP-vaccinated mice following heterosubtypic challenge with pandemic 2009 H1N1 virus. Two weeks post-last boost, H5N1-M2e-MAP-vaccinated mice were challenged with lethal dose (10LD50) of pandemic 2009 H1N1 virus A/Beijing/501/09 strain, and lung tissues were collected three days later. (A) Viral titers in lungs of infected mice. The data are expressed as Log10TCID50/g of lung tissues, and presented as GMT ± SD of 5 mice per group. * indicates P < 0.001 compared to the Freund's adjuvant control; ** means P < 0.001 compared to the aluminum adjuvant control. Experiments were repeated three times. (B) Histopathological changes in the lungs following virus challenge. The figure indicates the representative images of histopathological damage from H & E-stained lungs of 5 mice per group (magnification, 100×).
Figure 4Cross-protection of H5N1-M2e-MAP-vaccinated mice against lethal challenge of pandemic 2009 H1N1 virus. H5N1-M2e-MAP-vaccinated mice were challenged with lethal dose (10LD50) of heterosubtypic H1N1 virus A/Beijing/501/09 strain and monitored daily for 2 weeks post-challenge. (A) Percentage change (%) of mouse body weight. Each point represents mean body weight of 10 mice per group. (B) Survival rate (%). The significant differences (P < 0.001) of H5N1-M2e-MAP plus Freund's adjuvant versus Freund's adjuvant is indicated as *, while H5N1-M2e-MAP plus aluminum adjuvant versus aluminum adjuvant is indicated as **.