Literature DB >> 20624081

Improvements in robot-assisted prostatectomy: the effect of surgeon experience and technical changes on oncologic and functional outcomes.

David B Samadi1, Paul Muntner, Fatima Nabizada-Pace, Jonathan S Brajtbord, John Carlucci, Hugh J Lavery.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of surgeon experience and technical modifications on functional and oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were available for 1181 of 1420 consecutive patients undergoing RALP by a single surgeon (DBS). Three techniques were evaluated. The "initial" technique included incision of the lateral endopelvic fascia, suture ligation of the dorsal venous complex (DVC), and anterior tennis-racquet bladder neck reconstruction (n = 590 procedures). The "intermediate" technique included a modified "curtain" nerve-sparing technique and incision of the DVC without previous ligation (n = 170). The "current" technique uses a posterior tennis-racquet bladder neck reconstruction (n = 421). Outcomes included continence and potency recovery and the presence of pT(2) surgical margins assessed in continuous fashion. Validated questionnaires were used to assess baseline and postoperative functional outcomes.
RESULTS: Continence rates improved between techniques at all evaluated time points, with 1-year continence rates of 88%, 93%, and 96% in the initial, intermediate, and current technique groups, respectively (Ptrend <0.001). One-year potency rates, however, remained similar among the groups, with rates of 77%, 84%, and 79%, respectively (P = 0.58). pT(2) margin rates decreased continuously during the initial technique period, followed by a transient worsening of margin rates during the intermediate time period and a subsequent decrease during the period when the current technique was used.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased experience with robot-assisted prostatectomy resulted in improvements in oncologic and functional outcomes. Modifications to robot-assisted prostatectomy techniques may aid in this improvement but are also associated with transient worsening of outcomes during the learning curve of the new technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20624081     DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Dae-Seon Yoo; Cheryn Song; Sahyun Park; Sejun Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Yongmee Cho; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Prevention of postprostatectomy incontinence: etiology and risk factors].

Authors:  R Mager; M Kurosch; T Hüsch; M Reiter; I Tsaur; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and previous surgical history: a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Adrien N Bernstein; Hugh J Lavery; Adele R Hobbs; Edward Chin; David B Samadi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-06-09

4.  Erectile dysfunction in robotic radical prostatectomy: Outcomes and management.

Authors:  Patrick Whelan; Shahid Ekbal; Ajay Nehra
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-10

5.  Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Performed after Previous Suprapubic Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Johnson F Tsui; Michael Feuerstein; Seyed Behzad Jazayeri; David B Samadi
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2016-11-02

6.  A novel intraoperative physician-assigned grading score to predict postoperative return of potency at 1 year after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rajesh R Bajpai; Shirin Razdan; Marcos A Sanchez; Sanjay Razdan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar

Review 7.  Surgical techniques to improve continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmet Urkmez; Weranja Ranasinghe; John W Davis
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

8.  Correlation of urinary loss rate after catheter removal and long-term urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Tatenuma; Kazuhide Makiyama; Yusuke Ito; Kentaro Muraoka; Hisashi Hasumi; Narihiko Hayashi; Keiichi Kondo; Noboru Nakaigawa; Masahiro Yao
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.369

9.  The surgical learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single surgeon with 500 cases in Taiwan, China.

Authors:  Yen-Chuan Ou; Chun-Kuang Yang; Kuangh-Si Chang; John Wang; Siu-Wan Hung; Min-Che Tung; Ashutosh K Tewari; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  A match-pair analysis of continence in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the role of urine loss ratio and predictive analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Tienza; Yigit Akin; Jens Rassweiler; Ali Serdar Gözen
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2017-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.